表2_社交媒体平台肺结节信息内容准确性和可靠性：YouTube、Bilibili和TikTok跨平台研究
跨平台研究表2数据，评估YouTube、Bilibili和TikTok肺结节视频的内容准确性、可靠性与参与度。
基本信息
资源简介
表2_社交媒体平台肺结节信息内容准确性和可靠性：YouTube、Bilibili和TikTok跨平台研究
【一句话概览】
本数据集是 figshare 公开的结构化表格数据集，收录 1 个文件、合计 2.65 MB，主题涵盖 pulmonary nodule、public health、social media、online video、information quality，可用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析，CC BY 4.0 许可开放获取。
【数据集背景】
本数据集源站标题为《Table 2_Content accuracy and reliability of pulmonary nodule information on social media platforms: a cross-platform study of YouTube, Bilibili, and TikTok.docx》。配套论文《COVID-19 on TikTok: harnessing an emerging social media platform to convey important public health messages》发表于 International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health（2020），DOI：10.1515/ijamh-2020-0111。源站首次发布：2025-09-22。
【数据内容】
源站原始描述：BackgroundPulmonary nodules (PNs) are often overlooked, potentially leading to health risks. Social media platforms are increasingly used for health information dissemination. This study evaluates the quality and engagement of PN-related videos on YouTube, Bilibili, and TikTok. MethodsOn March 1, 2025, we searched each platform using “pulmonary nodule” or its Chinese equivalent. After screening, 271 videos were analyzed. Video characteristics were documented, and quality was assessed using PEMAT…
【数据结构与技术规格】
文件数 1 个，合计 2.65 MB。Table 2_Content accuracy and reliability of pulmonary nodule information on social media platforms: a cross-platform study of YouTube, Bilibili, and T.docx：application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document，2.65 MB。数据集 DOI：10.3389/fmed.2025.1613526.s002。
【主题与分类】
源站学科分类：Foetal Development and Medicine。主题标签：pulmonary nodule、public health、social media、online video、information quality。
【适用方向】
结构化表格数据可直接用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析。
【获取与许可】
源站页面：https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Table_2_Content_accuracy_and_reliability_of_pulmonary_nodule_information_on_social_media_platforms_a_cross-platform_study_of_YouTube_Bilibili_and_TikTok_docx/30179590
使用许可：CC BY 4.0（https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/）。
规范引用：Zhou, Yunanji; Zeng, Xiang; Yuan, Ting; Wang, Qian; Wu, Siqi; Du, Lei; et al. (2025). Table 2_Content accuracy and reliability of pulmonary nodule information on social media platforms: a cross-platform study of YouTube, Bilibili, and TikTok.docx. Frontiers. Dataset
下载信息
注册下载
需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载，适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。
暂未开放公开下载
无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档，适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。
免登录有偿下载
公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。
提供高速下载与技术交付服务（收技术服务费，非数据销售）
暂未开放当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管，完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。
使用方式
数据集获取（Figshare）
- 源站标题：Table 2_Content accuracy and reliability of pulmonary nodule information on social media platforms: a cross-platform study of YouTube, Bilibili, and TikTok.docx
- DOI：10.3389/fmed.2025.1613526.s002
- 发布日期：2025-09-22
- 文件数：1 个
- 文件总体积：2.65 MB
- 源站页面：https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Table_2_Content_accuracy_and_reliability_of_pulmonary_nodule_information_on_social_media_platforms_a_cross-platform_study_of_YouTube_Bilibili_and_TikTok_docx/30179590
命令行下载
curl -L -o "Table 2_Content accuracy and reliability of pulmonary nodule information on social media platforms: a cross-platform study of YouTube, Bilibili, and T.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/58136473"
文件清单
Table 2_Content accuracy and reliability of pulmonary nodule information on social media platforms: a cross-platform study of YouTube, Bilibili, and T.docx（2.65 MB）
文件总体积 2.65 MB（源站 API 实测）。
数据说明
BackgroundPulmonary nodules (PNs) are often overlooked, potentially leading to health risks. Social media platforms are increasingly used for health information dissemination. This study evaluates the quality and engagement of PN-related videos on YouTube, Bilibili, and TikTok.
MethodsOn March 1, 2025, we searched each platform using “pulmonary nodule” or its Chinese equivalent. After screening, 271 videos were analyzed. Video characteristics were documented, and quality was assessed using PEMAT, VIQI, GQS, and mDISCERN tools. Inter-rater reliability was high (κ = 0.81).
ResultsThe final sample included 98 (YouTube), 74 (Bilibili), and 99 (TikTok) videos. TikTok videos were the shortest (median 114 s) yet had the highest engagement. Nonprofit organizations dominated YouTube uploads; physicians were most common on Bilibili and TikTok. Treatment was the most covered topic. YouTube scored highest in comprehensibility and actionability (PEMAT-T/A), while Bilibili and TikTok scored higher in production quality (VIQI, GQS). Video quality did not differ significantly between professional and non-professional uploaders. Most quality metrics showed weak correlation with audience engagement.
ConclusionLong-form platforms (YouTube and Bilibili) offer higher-quality PN information but lower engagement, whereas short-form platforms (TikTok) show high interaction but lower informational depth. Social media can play a supportive role in public PN education. We provide recommendations for creators, platforms, and viewers to improve the quality and reliability of medical content.
许可
CC BY 4.0
引用
学术使用请引用 DOI 10.3389/fmed.2025.1613526.s002（source: https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Table_2_Content_accuracy_and_reliability_of_pulmonary_nodule_information_on_social_media_platforms_a_cross-platform_study_of_YouTube_Bilibili_and_TikTok_docx/30179590）。
数据缺失？
依托陕西、四川两大基地，我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系，覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程，为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。
⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务？立即联系我们获取专业方案。
