听力保健服务体验数据集（Manchaiah等，2021）

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Experiences with hearing health care services (Manchaiah et al., 2021)
• DOI：10.23641/asha.16455924.v1
• 发布日期：2021-09-07
• 文件数：1 个
• 文件总体积：518.21 KB
• 源站页面：https://asha.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Experiences_with_hearing_health_care_services_Manchaiah_et_al_2021_/16455924

命令行下载

curl -L -o "AJA-21-00041Manchaiah_SuppS1.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/30476463"

文件清单

• AJA-21-00041Manchaiah_SuppS1.pdf（518.21 KB）

文件总体积 518.21 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine experiences of hearing health care services as described in online consumer reviews.
Design: This study used a cross-sectional design. Online consumer reviews about hearing health care services generated from Google.com to an open-ended question “Share details of your own experience at this place” and perceived overall experience (indicated on a 5-point rating scale: “very good” to “very poor”) were extracted from 40 different cities across the United States. The open text contributed a text corpus of 9,622 unique consumer reviews. These responses were analyzed with the cluster analysis approach using an open-source automated text analysis software program, IRaMuTeQ, to identify key themes. Association between clusters and consumer experience ratings as well as consumer metadata (percentage of older adults in the city, region) were examined using the chi-square analysis.
Results: The majority of consumers appeared satisfied with their hearing health care services, with nearly 95% of consumers reporting “very good” and “good” on the global experience scale. The analysis of text responses resulted in seven clusters within two domains. Domain 1 (Clinical Processes) included the three clusters: administration processes, perceived benefits, and device acquisition. Domain 2 (Staff and Service Interactions) included the four clusters: clinician communications, staff professionalism, customer service, and provider satisfaction. Content relating to administration processes was associated with overall rating regarding the hearing health care service experience. Consumer’s reviews relating to administration processes mostly described negative experiences, and these participants were more inclined to provide poorer overall experience ratings. In addition, city characteristics (i.e., percentage of older adults, region) had bearing toward what elements of hearing health care services are highlighted more in the consumer reviews.
Conclusions: Consumers comment on a variety of elements when describing their experiences with hearing health care services. Experiences reported in most clusters were generally positive, although some c

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.23641/asha.16455924.v1（source: https://asha.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Experiences_with_hearing_health_care_services_Manchaiah_et_al_2021_/16455924）。