阿尔伯塔婴儿运动量表远程医疗可靠性评估数据集

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Reliability of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) When Used via Telehealth for Neurodevelopmentally High-Risk Infants
• DOI：10.6084/m9.figshare.28284551.v1
• 发布日期：2025-01-27
• 文件数：2 个
• 文件总体积：33.95 KB
• 源站页面：https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Reliability_of_the_Alberta_Infant_Motor_Scale_AIMS_When_Used_via_Telehealth_for_Neurodevelopmentally_High-Risk_Infants/28284551

命令行下载

curl -L -o "ipop_a_2451406_sm0940.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/51947390"
curl -L -o "ipop_a_2451406_sm0939.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/51947393"

文件清单

• ipop_a_2451406_sm0940.docx（16.64 KB）
• ipop_a_2451406_sm0939.docx（17.31 KB）

文件总体积 33.95 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

To assess the reliability of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) when conducted via recorded telehealth sessions by novice and expert raters.
Ten assessors (six novice, four expert) independently rated recorded telehealth assessments of 23 neurodevelopmentally high-risk infants twice. Inter- and intra-rater reliability of subscale scores, total score and percentile rankings were determined.
AIMS total score inter-rater reliability was excellent across all raters (ICC = 0.92–0.96). Inter-rater-reliability across prone, supine and sitting subscale scores was excellent (ICC = 0.90–0.96) but variable for standing subscale (ICC = 0.06–0.65). Novice total score intra-rater reliability was variable (ICC = 0.45–0.94); expert reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.93–1.00). Recording to real-time telehealth assessment had excellent intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.96). Time taken to complete the assessment was comparable to a face-to-face assessment (mean: 14.9 min). Novices paused/replayed each video more than experts (2.2 compared to 1.0 in Time 1; and 1.0 compared to 0.5 in Time 2).
The AIMS assessment is reliable when undertaken via telehealth consultation. Time taken to complete the assessment is comparable to a face-to-face assessment. Novice inter-rater reliability was similar to experts. Training and the ability to pause/review infant motor performance may explain the accuracy achieved.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.28284551.v1（source: https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Reliability_of_the_Alberta_Infant_Motor_Scale_AIMS_When_Used_via_Telehealth_for_Neurodevelopmentally_High-Risk_Infants/28284551）。