消费者对癌症登记驱动家族癌症检测路径的可接受性:一项基于可接受性理论框架的定性研究
一项基于访谈的定性研究,评估消费者对癌症登记驱动家族癌症检测路径的可接受性。

基本信息
资源简介
消费者对癌症登记驱动家族癌症检测路径的可接受性:一项基于可接受性理论框架的定性研究
【一句话概览】
本数据集是 figshare 公开的文本数据集,收录 3 个文件、合计 308.86 KB,主题涵盖 Familial cancer testing、cancer registry、implementation science、consumer acceptability、qualitative,可用于医学自然语言处理(实体识别、信息抽取等),CC BY 4.0 许可开放获取。
【数据集背景】
本数据集源站标题为《Consumer acceptability of a cancer registry-driven familial cancer testing pathway: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability》。配套论文《Consumer acceptability of a cancer registry-driven familial cancer testing pathway: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability》发表于 Future Oncology(2026),DOI:10.1080/14796694.2026.2621128。项目资助方:This study was funded through the Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Alliance and the Cancer Council Victoria. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.。源站首次发布:2026-02-07。
【数据内容】
源站原始描述:Familial cancer test referral rates for rare tumors are suboptimal and follow a social gradient; while cancer registries are legally mandated to collect comprehensive clinical pathological data which could be used to inform clinical practice. We aimed to investigate consumer acceptability of and preferred approach for a cancer registry-driven familial cancer testing notification pathway. A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews informed by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability w…
【数据结构与技术规格】
文件数 3 个,合计 308.86 KB。ifon_a_2621128_sm2722.docx:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document,17.88 KB。ifon_a_2621128_sm2720.pdf:application/pdf,237.62 KB。ifon_a_2621128_sm2719.docx:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document,53.37 KB。数据集 DOI:10.6084/m9.figshare.31287705.v1。
【主题与分类】
源站学科分类:Medicine、Neuroscience、Cancer、Science Policy。主题标签:Familial cancer testing、cancer registry、implementation science、consumer acceptability、qualitative。
【适用方向】
文本类数据可用于医学自然语言处理,如命名实体识别、信息抽取与文本分类。
【获取与许可】
源站页面:https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Consumer_acceptability_of_a_cancer_registry-driven_familial_cancer_testing_pathway_a_qualitative_study_using_the_Theoretical_Framework_of_Acceptability/31287705
使用许可:CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。
规范引用:Consumer acceptability of a cancer registry-driven familial cancer testing pathway: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Taylor & Francis. Fehlberg, Zoe; Evans, Sue M.; Bechelli, Maria; Peters, Sanne; Abraham, Anu; Bogwitz, Michael; et al
【使用注意】
· 源站最后修改于 2026-02-09,引用时请注意版本时效。
下载信息
注册下载
需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。
暂未开放公开下载
无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。
免登录有偿下载
公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。
提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)
暂未开放当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。
使用方式
数据集获取(Figshare)
- 源站标题:Consumer acceptability of a cancer registry-driven familial cancer testing pathway: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability
- DOI:10.6084/m9.figshare.31287705.v1
- 发布日期:2026-02-07
- 文件数:3 个
- 文件总体积:308.86 KB
- 源站页面:https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Consumer_acceptability_of_a_cancer_registry-driven_familial_cancer_testing_pathway_a_qualitative_study_using_the_Theoretical_Framework_of_Acceptability/31287705
命令行下载
curl -L -o "ifon_a_2621128_sm2722.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/61718741"
curl -L -o "ifon_a_2621128_sm2720.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/61718744"
curl -L -o "ifon_a_2621128_sm2719.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/61718747"
文件清单
ifon_a_2621128_sm2722.docx(17.88 KB)ifon_a_2621128_sm2720.pdf(237.62 KB)ifon_a_2621128_sm2719.docx(53.37 KB)
文件总体积 308.86 KB(源站 API 实测)。
数据说明
Familial cancer test referral rates for rare tumors are suboptimal and follow a social gradient; while cancer registries are legally mandated to collect comprehensive clinical pathological data which could be used to inform clinical practice. We aimed to investigate consumer acceptability of and preferred approach for a cancer registry-driven familial cancer testing notification pathway.
A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews informed by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability was conducted.
Nineteen individuals recently disclosed to the Victorian Cancer Registry diagnosed with a cancer meeting local familial cancer testing criteria were interviewed. Participants supported being notified directly by the cancer registry to inform them about familial cancer testing, as they welcomed using existing health data in new ways to optimize health care. Key considerations included the timing, tone, language, information provided in the registry communication, and minimizing the onus on the patient. Assuring data security and verifying the legitimacy of the registry were raised.
Individuals diagnosed with cancer found the service model acceptable. Participants preferred either to action the findings independently, with supporting resources, or permit the cancer registry to directly inform treating clinicians. Ongoing and consumer-informed work is required to develop processes and resources including digital options.
Cancer registries collect information about all new cancer diagnoses. This information could help identify people who might benefit from genetic testing, especially for rare cancers. However, not many people are currently referred for this testing. We wanted to know if people would be comfortable with cancer registries contacting them about genetic testing and how best to do this. We interviewed 19 people to get their thoughts. Most people were comfortable with the registry reaching out because they liked the idea of using health information to improve patient care. They had some important considerations including: making the contact easy to understand; taking care when and how to contact people after their diagnosis; including key informat
许可
CC BY 4.0
引用
学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.31287705.v1(source: https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Consumer_acceptability_of_a_cancer_registry-driven_familial_cancer_testing_pathway_a_qualitative_study_using_the_Theoretical_Framework_of_Acceptability/31287705)。
数据缺失?
依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。
⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。




