癌症幸存者综合老年评估的提供者认知与实施研究

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：DataSheet1_Examining provider perceptions and practices for comprehensive geriatric assessment among cancer survivors: a qualitative study with an implementation science focus.docx
• DOI：10.3389/fragi.2023.1305922.s001
• 发布日期：2023-12-28
• 文件数：1 个
• 文件总体积：21.84 KB
• 源站页面：https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/DataSheet1_Examining_provider_perceptions_and_practices_for_comprehensive_geriatric_assessment_among_cancer_survivors_a_qualitative_study_with_an_implementation_science_focus_docx/24913668

命令行下载

curl -L -o "DataSheet1_Examining provider perceptions and practices for comprehensive geriatric assessment among cancer survivors: a qualitative study with an imp.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/43842972"

文件清单

• DataSheet1_Examining provider perceptions and practices for comprehensive geriatric assessment among cancer survivors: a qualitative study with an imp.docx（21.84 KB）

文件总体积 21.84 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Introduction: Cancer rates increase with age, and older cancer survivors have unique medical care needs, making assessment of health status and identification of appropriate supportive resources key to delivery of optimal cancer care. Comprehensive geriatric assessments (CGAs) help determine an older person’s functional capabilities as cancer care providers plan treatment and follow-up care. Despite its proven utility, research on implementation of CGA is lacking.
Methods: Guided by a qualitative description approach and through interviews with primary care providers and oncologists, our goal was to better understand barriers and facilitators of CGA use and identify training and support needs for implementation. Participants were identified through Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network partner listservs and a national cancer and aging organization. Potential interviewees, contacted via email, were provided with a description of the study purpose. Eight semi-structured interviews were conducted via Zoom, recorded, and transcribed verbatim by a professional transcription service. The interview guide explored providers’ knowledge and use of CGAs. For codebook development, three representative transcripts were independently reviewed and coded by four team members. The interpretive process involved reflecting, transcribing, coding, and searching for and identifying themes.
Results: Providers shared that, while it would be ideal to administer CGAs with all new patients, they were not always able to do this. Instead, they used brief screening tools or portions of CGAs, or both. There was variability in how CGA domains were assessed; however, all considered CGAs useful and they communicated with patients about their benefits. Identified facilitators of implementation included having clinic champions, an interdisciplinary care team to assist with implementation and referrals for intervention, and institutional resources and buy-in. Barriers noted included limited staff capacity and competing demands on time, provider inexperience, and misaligned institutional priorities.
Discussion: Findings can guide solutions for improving the broader and more systematic use o

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.3389/fragi.2023.1305922.s001（source: https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/DataSheet1_Examining_provider_perceptions_and_practices_for_comprehensive_geriatric_assessment_among_cancer_survivors_a_qualitative_study_with_an_implementation_science_focus_docx/24913668）。