纳入研究的特征

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Characteristics of included studies.
• DOI：10.1371/journal.pone.0321719.t002
• 发布日期：2025-04-16
• 文件数：1 个
• 文件总体积：13.82 KB
• 源站页面：https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Characteristics_of_included_studies_/28808826

命令行下载

curl -L -o "Table 2.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/53709495"

文件清单

• Table 2.xls（13.82 KB）

文件总体积 13.82 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Background
During cancer treatment, patients are faced with major changes in physical function, psychological challenges and decline in quality of life. Self-advocacy is a key tool for patients to cope with the challenges of treatment. By fostering self-advocacy, patients can effectively self-manage, enhancing their overall quality of life and treatment outcomes. Besides, a significant majority of cancer patients encounter barriers when attempting to articulate their healthcare needs and engage in treatment decision-making processes. It’s important to identify obstacles in the process of self-advocacy. The aim of this meta-synthesis was to describe the patients’ experience of self-advocacy, and identify the facilitators and barriers of self-advocacy for cancer patients.
Methods
The review used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines guided reporting, and appraised the quality of each eligible study using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. A prospective review protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews(no: CRD42023493926). A qualitative meta-synthesis was performed by searching eight electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, CNKI, Wanfang and SinoMed for studies meeting pre-defined eligibility criteria, from inception to November, 2023. Two reviewers independently undertook screening and review of articles, using the CASP checklist for evaluating qualitative research. The data were synthesised using Thomas and Harden’s method of thematic and content analysis.
Results
A total of 7 papers were included, and 24 research findings were distilled and integrated into three themes: benefits; challenges; external environmental support; and seven sub-themes: Gain confidence; improve self-management ability; Interaction and share; lack of awareness; obstacles; health system support and social support.
Conclusions
Cancer patients have different levels of self-advocacy ability, which is the result of the interaction between personal consciousness and family and social environment. Factors influencing self-initiative

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0321719.t002（source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Characteristics_of_included_studies_/28808826）。