表1_基于CTA的Eagle综合征颈动脉变异型风险评估：列线图开发与内部验证.docx

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Table 1_CTA-based risk assessment of the carotid variant of Eagle syndrome: development and internal validation of a nomogram.docx
• DOI：10.3389/fneur.2025.1699139.s003
• 发布日期：2025-10-30
• 文件数：1 个
• 文件总体积：685.72 KB
• 源站页面：https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Table_1_CTA-based_risk_assessment_of_the_carotid_variant_of_Eagle_syndrome_development_and_internal_validation_of_a_nomogram_docx/30485912

命令行下载

curl -L -o "Table 1_CTA-based risk assessment of the carotid variant of Eagle syndrome: development and internal validation of a nomogram.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/59173172"

文件清单

• Table 1_CTA-based risk assessment of the carotid variant of Eagle syndrome: development and internal validation of a nomogram.docx（685.72 KB）

文件总体积 685.72 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

BackgroundEagle syndrome (ES) is uncommon; its carotid variant [ES–CA, sometimes termed vascular Eagle syndrome (VES)] can produce internal carotid artery (ICA) dissection or stenosis and ischemic stroke, yet is frequently underrecognized. This study leveraged large-sample computed tomography angiography (CTA) to quantify structural determinants of styloid–ICA contact and to develop and internally validate a nomogram for early risk stratification.
MethodsWe retrospectively included 414 consecutive head–neck CTA examinations (January 2023–March 2025). Volume rendering (VR) and maximum intensity projection (MIP) were used to delineate styloid–vessel relationships and to measure styloid process length (SPL), anterior tilt angle (FTA), and medial inclination angle (IA). Univariable/multivariable logistic regression identified correlates of ICA contact; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses compared alternative SPL metrics (ipsilateral, bilateral mean, bilateral maximum) to select the optimal predictor. A nomogram incorporating significant predictors underwent 1,000-bootstrap internal validation with assessment of discrimination, calibration, and decision-curve analysis (DCA).
ResultsICA contact was present in 110/414 (26.6%). Men had longer styloids and larger FTAs than women (both p Risk of ES–CA–related ICA contact was unrelated to age or angular parameters. Styloid length and sex were the principal structural risk factors, with right-sided predominance in men and left-sided predominance in women, suggesting sex–side interaction. SPL-max was the optimal predictor, with a 3.45-mm lower cut-off in women, and the internally validated nomogram demonstrated clinical utility for early, imaging-based screening.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.3389/fneur.2025.1699139.s003（source: https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Table_1_CTA-based_risk_assessment_of_the_carotid_variant_of_Eagle_syndrome_development_and_internal_validation_of_a_nomogram_docx/30485912）。