数据表1_比较评估ChatGPT各版本在提供幽门螺杆菌感染信息中的准确性和可靠性.docx
评估ChatGPT-3.5/4/4o回答幽门螺杆菌感染临床问题准确性与可靠性的数据表,含27个问题及专家评分。

基本信息
资源简介
数据表1_比较评估ChatGPT各版本在提供幽门螺杆菌感染信息中的准确性和可靠性.docx
【一句话概览】
本数据集是 figshare 公开的文本数据集,收录 1 个文件、合计 35.76 KB,主题涵盖 artificial intelligence、Helicobacter pylori、large language model、patient education、ChatGPT,可用于医学自然语言处理(实体识别、信息抽取等),CC BY 4.0 许可开放获取。
【数据集背景】
本数据集源站标题为《Data Sheet 1_Comparative evaluation of the accuracy and reliability of ChatGPT versions in providing information on Helicobacter pylori infection.docx》。配套论文《Helicobacter pylori infection and antibiotic resistance — from biology to clinical implications》发表于 Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology(2021),DOI:10.1038/s41575-021-00449-x。源站首次发布:2025-05-15。
【数据内容】
源站原始描述:ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of responses provided by three versions of ChatGPT (ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and ChatGPT-4o) to questions related to Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection, as well as to explore their potential applications within the healthcare domain. MethodsA panel of experts compiled and refined a set of 27 clinical questions related to Hp. These questions were presented to each ChatGPT version, generating three distinct sets of responses. The re…
【数据结构与技术规格】
文件数 1 个,合计 35.76 KB。Data Sheet 1_Comparative evaluation of the accuracy and reliability of ChatGPT versions in providing information on Helicobacter pylori infection.docx:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document,35.76 KB。数据集 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1566982.s001。
【主题与分类】
源站学科分类:Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified。主题标签:artificial intelligence、Helicobacter pylori、large language model、patient education、ChatGPT。
【适用方向】
文本类数据可用于医学自然语言处理,如命名实体识别、信息抽取与文本分类。
【获取与许可】
源站页面:https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_Sheet_1_Comparative_evaluation_of_the_accuracy_and_reliability_of_ChatGPT_versions_in_providing_information_on_Helicobacter_pylori_infection_docx/29068859
使用许可:CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。
规范引用:Ye, Yi; Zheng, En-dian; Lan, Qiao-li; Wu, Le-can; Sun, Hao-yue; Xu, Bei-bei; et al. (2025). Data Sheet 1_Comparative evaluation of the accuracy and reliability of ChatGPT versions in providing information on Helicobacter pylori infection.docx. Frontiers. Dataset
下载信息
注册下载
需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。
暂未开放公开下载
无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。
免登录有偿下载
公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。
提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)
暂未开放当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。
使用方式
数据集获取(Figshare)
- 源站标题:Data Sheet 1_Comparative evaluation of the accuracy and reliability of ChatGPT versions in providing information on Helicobacter pylori infection.docx
- DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1566982.s001
- 发布日期:2025-05-15
- 文件数:1 个
- 文件总体积:35.76 KB
- 源站页面:https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_Sheet_1_Comparative_evaluation_of_the_accuracy_and_reliability_of_ChatGPT_versions_in_providing_information_on_Helicobacter_pylori_infection_docx/29068859
命令行下载
curl -L -o "Data Sheet 1_Comparative evaluation of the accuracy and reliability of ChatGPT versions in providing information on Helicobacter pylori infection.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/54552626"
文件清单
Data Sheet 1_Comparative evaluation of the accuracy and reliability of ChatGPT versions in providing information on Helicobacter pylori infection.docx(35.76 KB)
文件总体积 35.76 KB(源站 API 实测)。
数据加载示例(图像类)
from PIL import Image
import glob, os
files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
+ glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
+ glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)
# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path) # 要求 子目录=类别
目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。
数据说明
ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of responses provided by three versions of ChatGPT (ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and ChatGPT-4o) to questions related to Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection, as well as to explore their potential applications within the healthcare domain.
MethodsA panel of experts compiled and refined a set of 27 clinical questions related to Hp. These questions were presented to each ChatGPT version, generating three distinct sets of responses. The responses were evaluated and scored by three gastroenterology specialists utilizing a 5-point Likert scale, with an emphasis on accuracy and comprehensiveness. To assess response stability and reliability, each question was submitted three times over three consecutive days.
ResultsStatistically significant differences in the Likert scale scores were observed among the three ChatGPT versions (p All three versions of ChatGPT were effective in addressing Hp-related questions, with ChatGPT-4o delivering the most accurate information. These findings suggest that artificial intelligence-driven chat models hold significant potential in healthcare, facilitating improved patient awareness, self-management, and treatment compliance, as well as supporting physicians in making informed medical decisions by providing accurate information and personalized recommendations.
许可
CC BY 4.0
引用
学术使用请引用 DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1566982.s001(source: https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_Sheet_1_Comparative_evaluation_of_the_accuracy_and_reliability_of_ChatGPT_versions_in_providing_information_on_Helicobacter_pylori_infection_docx/29068859)。
数据缺失?
依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。
⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。




