社区视力筛查与三级中心治疗之间的障碍-55773

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Barriers between community screening for visual problems and treatments in a tertiary center
• DOI：10.6084/m9.figshare.7420283.v1
• 发布日期：2018-12-05
• 文件数：5 个
• 文件总体积：231.81 KB
• 源站页面：https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Barriers_between_community_screening_for_visual_problems_and_treatments_in_a_tertiary_center/7420283

命令行下载

curl -L -o "0034-8910-rsp-52-87872018052000589-gf01.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/13739906"
curl -L -o "0034-8910-rsp-52-87872018052000589-gf02.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/13739912"
curl -L -o "Table_1.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/13739915"
curl -L -o "Table_2.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/13739918"
curl -L -o "Table_3.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/13739921"

文件清单

• 0034-8910-rsp-52-87872018052000589-gf01.jpg（92.48 KB）
• 0034-8910-rsp-52-87872018052000589-gf02.jpg（122.43 KB）
• Table_1.xls（5.63 KB）
• Table_2.xls（5.63 KB）
• Table_3.xls（5.63 KB）

文件总体积 231.81 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of mobile ophthalmic unit screenings and to investigate barriers between community care and resolution of the problem at a tertiary center. METHODS This prospective study evaluated a convenience sample from 10 municipalities in São Paulo State, Brazil. Patients were assessed in the municipality by a mobile ophthalmic unit and underwent a complete ophthalmic consultation. Patients were referred as warranted to a tertiary hospital. RESULTS The mobile ophthalmic unit screened 1,928 individuals and 714 (37%) were referred. The mean age of the referred patients was 57.12 (SD = 19.5) years with best corrected visual acuity of 0.37 (SD = 0.36) logMAR. Forty-seven (6.6%) patients were blind and 185 (26.5%) were visually impaired. Cataracts (44.7%) and pterygium (14.7%) accounted for most referrals. Of those referred, 67.1% presented to the tertiary center. The diagnosis by the mobile ophthalmic unit corresponded to the one by the tertiary center in 88.5% of the cases. There were a significantly higher number of blind and visually impaired persons among those who presented to the hospital. There was a significantly greater attendance among patients living in more distant municipalities from the reference center with a higher number of inhabitants and a greater number of ophthalmologists in the cities of origin (p < 0.05, all comparisons). Complete treatment was performed in 65.6% of patients, and loss to follow-up was the main cause of incomplete treatment in 50.7% of patients. A total of 313 cataract surgeries were performed, which reduced the number of blind patients from 20 to 2 and of visually impaired individuals from 87 to 2 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Only 37% of the patients assessed by a mobile ophthalmic unit required referral to a tertiary hospital. Among the referred patients, 67.1% presented to the hospital, and complete resolution after treatment was approximately 65.5%. There was a significant improvement in visual acuity and a reduction in the prevalence of blindness and visual impairment postoperatively.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.7420283.v1（source: https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Barriers_between_community_screening_for_visual_problems_and_treatments_in_a_tertiary_center/7420283）。