理解成人创伤性脑损伤康复中的“质量”：不同利益相关者视角的参与式混合方法研究

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Understanding ‘quality’ in adult traumatic brain injury rehabilitation from the perspectives of different stakeholders: a participatory mixed methods study
• DOI：10.6084/m9.figshare.27800293.v1
• 发布日期：2024-11-17
• 文件数：4 个
• 文件总体积：147.11 KB
• 源站页面：https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Understanding_quality_in_adult_traumatic_brain_injury_rehabilitation_from_the_perspectives_of_different_stakeholders_a_participatory_mixed_methods_study/27800293

命令行下载

curl -L -o "tbin-2024-0270-File003.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/50571265"
curl -L -o "tbin-2024-0270-File004.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/50571268"
curl -L -o "tbin-2024-0270-File005.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/50571271"
curl -L -o "tbin-2024-0270-File006.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/50571274"

文件清单

• tbin-2024-0270-File003.docx（66.52 KB）
• tbin-2024-0270-File004.docx（27.75 KB）
• tbin-2024-0270-File005.docx（20.17 KB）
• tbin-2024-0270-File006.docx（32.67 KB）

文件总体积 147.11 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

The purpose of this study was to explore how ‘quality’ is understood for traumatic brain injury (TBI) rehabilitation from the perspectives of the rehabilitation recipients, their families and the providing clinicians.
A participatory study using a mixed-methods, triangulation design.
The study involved 1. a systematic literature search; 2. Individual semi-structured interviews with people with TBI and/or their caregivers and TBI rehabilitation clinicians, and 3. an online consensus process.
22 participants (7 people with TBI, 8 caregivers, 7 clinicians) participated in individual interviews. Their transcribed data were coded into broad categories via in-depth reflexive, thematic analysis; these categories were then mapped to 13 quality domains extracted from the literature. The emergent themes were then presented to the individuals, via an electronic consensus tool in two rounds. This resulted in 12 prioritized domains of quality that encompass service features, staff qualities and effectiveness.
These evidence-informed and consensus-agreed indicators for quality may help guide both the provision and evaluation of TBI rehabilitation, that is valued and meaningful.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.27800293.v1（source: https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Understanding_quality_in_adult_traumatic_brain_injury_rehabilitation_from_the_perspectives_of_different_stakeholders_a_participatory_mixed_methods_study/27800293）。