Implant Evaluation of an Insertable Cardiac Monitor Outside the Electrophysiology Lab Setting

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Implant Evaluation of an Insertable Cardiac Monitor Outside the Electrophysiology Lab Setting
• DOI：10.1371/journal.pone.0071544
• 发布日期：2013-08-15
• 文件数：2 个
• 文件总体积：1.37 MB
• 源站页面：https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Implant_Evaluation_of_an_Insertable_Cardiac_Monitor_Outside_the_Electrophysiology_Lab_Setting_/773867

命令行下载

curl -L -o "Checklist_S1.doc" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/1171491"
curl -L -o "Protocol_S1.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/1171492"

文件清单

• Checklist_S1.doc（222.72 KB）
• Protocol_S1.pdf（1.15 MB）

文件总体积 1.37 MB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Background
To date, insertable cardiac monitors (ICM) have been implanted in the hospital without critical evaluation of other potential settings. Providing alternatives to in-hospital insertion may increase access to ICM, decrease waiting times for patients awaiting diagnosis, and reduce hospital resources.
Methods
This was a prospective, non-randomized, clinical trial involving nine clinical sites throughout the United States designed to assess the feasibility of ICM implants in a non-hospital setting. Other than the Reveal® ICM, implant supplies and techniques were left to physician discretion in patients who met indications. Patients were followed up to 90 days post-implant. The primary objective was to characterize the number of procedure-related adverse events that required surgical intervention within 90 days.
Results
Sixty-five patients were implanted at nine out-of-hospital sites. The insertion procedure was well tolerated by all patients. There were no deaths, systemic infections or endocarditis. There were two (3%) procedure-related adverse events requiring device explant and four (6%) adverse events not requiring explant. ICM use led to 16 diagnoses (24.6%) with 9 patients proceeding to alternate cardiac device implants during the course of the 90-day follow up.
Conclusion
Out-of-hospital ICM insertion can be accomplished with comparable procedural safety and represents a reasonable alternative to the in-hospital setting.
Clinicaltrials.gov registration number:NCT01168427

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0071544（source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Implant_Evaluation_of_an_Insertable_Cardiac_Monitor_Outside_the_Electrophysiology_Lab_Setting_/773867）。