筛查房颤——初级医疗保健专业人员横断面调查

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Screening for Atrial Fibrillation – A Cross-Sectional Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Primary Care
• DOI：10.1371/journal.pone.0152086
• 发布日期：2016-04-01
• 文件数：2 个
• 文件总体积：268.39 KB
• 源站页面：https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Screening_for_Atrial_Fibrillation_A_Cross_Sectional_Survey_of_Healthcare_Professionals_in_Primary_Care/3149002

命令行下载

curl -L -o "S1 Data.xlsx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/4906000"
curl -L -o "S1 Survey.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/4906003"

文件清单

• S1 Data.xlsx（54.21 KB）
• S1 Survey.docx（214.17 KB）

文件总体积 268.39 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Introduction
Screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) in primary care has been recommended; however, the views of healthcare professionals (HCPs) are not known. This study aimed to determine the opinions of HCP about the feasibility of implementing screening within a primary care setting.
Methods
A cross-sectional mixed methods census survey of 418 HCPs from 59 inner-city practices (Nottingham, UK) was conducted between October-December 2014. Postal and web-surveys ascertained data on existing methods, knowledge, skills, attitudes, barriers and facilitators to AF screening using Likert scale and open-ended questions. Responses, categorized according to HCP group, were summarized using proportions, adjusting for clustering by practice, with 95% C.Is and free-text responses using thematic analysis.
Results
At least one General Practitioner (GP) responded from 48 (81%) practices. There were 212/418 (51%) respondents; 118/229 GPs, 67/129 nurses [50 practice nurses; 17 Nurse Practitioners (NPs)], 27/60 healthcare assistants (HCAs). 39/48 (81%) practices had an ECG machine and diagnosed AF in-house. Non-GP HCPs reported having less knowledge about ECG interpretation, diagnosing and treating AF than GPs. A greater proportion of non-GP HCPs reported they would benefit from ECG training specifically for AF diagnosis than GPs [proportion (95% CI) GPs: 11.9% (6.8–20.0); HCAs: 37.0% (21.7–55.5); nurses: 44.0% (30.0–59.0); NPs 41.2% (21.9–63.7)]. Barriers included time, workload and capacity to undertake screening activities, although training to diagnose and manage AF was a required facilitator.
Conclusion
Inner-city general practices were found to have adequate access to resources for AF screening. There is enthusiasm by non-GP HCPs to up-skill in the diagnosis and management of AF and they may have a role in future AF screening. However, organisational barriers, such as lack of time, staff and capacity, should be overcome for AF screening to be feasibly implemented within primary care.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0152086（source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Screening_for_Atrial_Fibrillation_A_Cross_Sectional_Survey_of_Healthcare_Professionals_in_Primary_Care/3149002）。