阵发性房颤三种心脏消融策略的成本-后果分析数据集

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：A cost-consequence analysis comparing three cardiac ablation strategies for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
• DOI：10.6084/m9.figshare.26058962.v2
• 发布日期：2024-07-02
• 文件数：2 个
• 文件总体积：153.23 KB
• 源站页面：https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/A_cost-consequence_analysis_comparing_three_cardiac_ablation_strategies_for_the_treatment_of_paroxysmal_atrial_fibrillation/26058962

命令行下载

curl -L -o "ijme_a_2369433_sm6793.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/47360116"
curl -L -o "ijme_a_2369433_sm9128.png" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/47123489"

文件清单

• ijme_a_2369433_sm6793.docx（112.13 KB）
• ijme_a_2369433_sm9128.png（41.10 KB）

文件总体积 153.23 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据说明

Cardiac ablation is a well-established method for treating atrial fibrillation (AF). Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a non-thermal therapeutic alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoballoon ablation (CRYO). PFA uses high-voltage electric pulses to target cells. The present analysis aims to quantify the costs, outcomes, and resources associated with these three ablation strategies for paroxysmal AF.
Real-world clinical data were prospectively collected during index hospitalization by three European medical centers (Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands) specialized in cardiac ablation. These data included procedure times (pre-procedural, skin-to-skin and post-procedural), resource use, and staff burden. Data regarding complications associated with each of the three treatment options and redo procedures were extracted from the literature. Costs were collected from hospital economic formularies and published cost databases. A cost-consequence model from the hospital perspective was built to estimate the impact of the three treatment options in terms of effectiveness and costs.
Across the three centers, N = 91 patients were included over a period of 12 months. A significant difference was seen in pre-procedural time (mean ± SD, PFA: 13.6 ± 3.7 min, CRYO: 18.8 ± 6.6 min, RFA: 20.4 ± 6.4 min; p p PFA demonstrated shorter procedure time compared to CRYO and RFA. Model estimates indicate that these time savings result in cost savings for hospitals and reduce outlay on redo procedures. Clinical practice in individual hospitals varies and may impact the ability to transfer the results of this analysis to other settings.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.26058962.v2（source: https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/A_cost-consequence_analysis_comparing_three_cardiac_ablation_strategies_for_the_treatment_of_paroxysmal_atrial_fibrillation/26058962）。