表3：评估创伤性脑损伤与无家可归者临床实践指南公平性的系统评价方案

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Table_3_A systematic review protocol for assessing equity in clinical practice guidelines for traumatic brain injury and homelessness.pdf
• DOI：10.3389/fmed.2022.815660.s003
• 发布日期：2022-07-22
• 文件数：1 个
• 文件总体积：115.60 KB
• 源站页面：https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Table_3_A_systematic_review_protocol_for_assessing_equity_in_clinical_practice_guidelines_for_traumatic_brain_injury_and_homelessness_pdf/20354616

命令行下载

curl -L -o "Table_3_A systematic review protocol for assessing equity in clinical practice guidelines for traumatic brain injury and homelessness.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/36384516"

文件清单

• Table_3_A systematic review protocol for assessing equity in clinical practice guidelines for traumatic brain injury and homelessness.pdf（115.60 KB）

文件总体积 115.60 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

BackgroundWhen used optimally, clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) can reduce inappropriate variations in practice, improve application of research to practice, and enhance the quality of healthcare. However, a common criticism, despite its potential, is the lack of consideration for equity and disadvantaged populations.
ObjectivesThis protocol is for a systematic review of CPGs for traumatic brain injury (TBI) and homelessness that aims to assess (1) the extent to which evidence regarding TBI and homelessness is integrated in CPGs for homelessness and TBI, respectively, and (2) equity considerations in CPGs for TBI and homelessness.
Methods and analysisThe methodology for this review is guided by the PRISMA-P, validated search filters for CPGs, and methodological guides to searching systematic reviews and gray literature. CPGs will be identified from (a) databases for peer-reviewed literature (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycInfo), (b) targeted websites and Google Search for gray literature, and © reference lists of peer-reviewed and gray literature that meet the eligibility criteria. Searching for gray literature, including from guideline-specific resources, is a critical component of this review and is considered an efficient approach to identifying CPGs, given the low precision of searching peer-reviewed databases. Two independent reviewers will screen all articles based on pre-determined eligibility criteria. A narrative synthesis will be conducted to identify the proportion of CPGs that integrate evidence about TBI and homelessness and how TBI and homelessness is or is not integrated in CPGs. Quality appraisal will take the form of an equity assessment of CPGs and will be completed independently by two reviewers.
ConclusionThis protocol outlines the methodology for a systematic review of CPGs for TBI and homelessness. The resulting systematic review from this protocol will form an evidence-based foundation to advance CPGs for individuals with lived experience of TBI and homelessness.
Systematic review registrationidentifier: CRD42021287696.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.3389/fmed.2022.815660.s003（source: https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Table_3_A_systematic_review_protocol_for_assessing_equity_in_clinical_practice_guidelines_for_traumatic_brain_injury_and_homelessness_pdf/20354616）。