创伤性脑损伤临床实践指南开发质量:一项系统评价

创伤性脑损伤临床实践指南质量的系统评价数据集,包含24个指南的AGREE II评估得分。

NIAID Data Ecosystem
浏览 14
文本CPGMEDLINEClinical Practice GuidelinesLMICEMBASEAGREE II instrumentscoreClinical Practice GuidelinePRISMAHICincome settingsNational Clinical Guideline
Quality of the Development of Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Systematic Review

基本信息

模态
文本
大小
0.000334312 GB
许可
CC BY 4.0
创建/更新时间
2026-10-09
版本
v1

资源简介

创伤性脑损伤临床实践指南开发质量:一项系统评价

【一句话概览】

本数据集是 figshare 公开的文本数据集,收录 2 个文件、合计 334.31 KB,主题涵盖 CPG、MEDLINE、Clinical Practice Guidelines、LMIC、EMBASE,可用于医学自然语言处理(实体识别、信息抽取等),CC BY 4.0 许可开放获取。

【数据集背景】

本数据集源站标题为《Quality of the Development of Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Systematic Review》。配套论文《Quality of the Development of Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Systematic Review》发表于 PLOS ONE(2016),DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0161554。源站首次发布:2016-09-01。

【数据内容】

源站原始描述:Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death worldwide and is increasing exponentially particularly in low and middle income countries (LMIC). To inform the development of a standard Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for the acute management of TBI that can be implemented specifically for limited resource settings, we conducted a systematic review to identify and assess the quality of all currently available CPGs on acute TBI using the AGREE II instrument. In accordance with PRISMA g…

中文译文(机器翻译,仅供快速理解,请以原文为准):创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是全球主要死因之一,并且正呈指数级增长,尤其是在低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)。为促进制定一部可专门在资源有限环境中实施、用于TBI急性期管理的标准临床实践指南(CPG),我们进行了一项系统综述,使用AGREE II工具识别并评估当前所有可获得的急性TBI CPG的质量。根据PRISMA指南,我们于2013年4月至2015年12月检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、Google Scholar和Duke University Medical Center Library Guidelines,纳入关于TBI急性期管理(不足24小时)、任何级别TBI、高收入和低收入环境的同行评审已发表临床实践指南。并进行了全面的参考文献和引文分析。所发现的CPG由五名独立评价者使用AGREE II工具进行评估,评分经汇总后以占最高总分的百分比报告。最初评估了2742篇文章,加上来自引文和参考文献分析的额外98篇文章,共审查了273篇全文。最终纳入24部CPG,其中23部来自高收入国家(HIC),1部来自LMIC。基于AGREE II工具,总体评估最佳得分为100.0,来自National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence(NIHCE,2007)的CPG;其次是New Zealand Guidelines Group(NZ,200

【数据结构与技术规格】

文件数 2 个,合计 334.31 KB。S1 Appendix.DOCX:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document,146.03 KB。S2 Appendix.DOCX:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document,188.28 KB。数据集 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0161554。

【主题与分类】

源站学科分类:Medicine、Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified、Science Policy。主题标签:CPG、MEDLINE、Clinical Practice Guidelines、LMIC、EMBASE、AGREE II instrument、score、Clinical Practice Guideline、PRISMA、HIC。

【适用方向】

文本类数据可用于医学自然语言处理,如命名实体识别、信息抽取与文本分类。

【获取与许可】

源站页面:https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Quality_of_the_Development_of_Traumatic_Brain_Injury_Clinical_Practice_Guidelines_A_Systematic_Review/3800565

使用许可:CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。

规范引用:Patel, Anjni; Vieira, Mateus Mazorra Coelho; Abraham, John; Reid, Nick; Tran, Tu; Tomecsek, Kevin; et al. (2016). Quality of the Development of Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Systematic Review. PLOS ONE. Dataset

【使用注意】

· 源站最后修改于 2023-06-01,引用时请注意版本时效。

官方服务

专家保障全链路合规授权与标注交付

陕川双基地 × 超十家三甲医院直连

从合规授权、采集治理、专业标注到数据集交付,我们提供全链路闭环服务,让高质量临床数据即拿即用。

⚡️ 需要原始数据或标注支持?联系我们获取定制方案。

帮我联系

下载信息

注册下载

需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。

暂未开放

公开下载

无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。

免登录

有偿下载

公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。

提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)

暂未开放

当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。

使用方式

数据集获取(Figshare)

命令行下载

curl -L -o "S1 Appendix.DOCX" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/5916867"
curl -L -o "S2 Appendix.DOCX" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/5916873"

文件清单

  • S1 Appendix.DOCX(146.03 KB)
  • S2 Appendix.DOCX(188.28 KB)

文件总体积 334.31 KB(源站 API 实测)。

数据加载示例(图像类)

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death worldwide and is increasing exponentially particularly in low and middle income countries (LMIC). To inform the development of a standard Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for the acute management of TBI that can be implemented specifically for limited resource settings, we conducted a systematic review to identify and assess the quality of all currently available CPGs on acute TBI using the AGREE II instrument. In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, from April 2013 to December 2015 we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar and the Duke University Medical Center Library Guidelines for peer-reviewed published Clinical Practice Guidelines on the acute management of TBI (less than 24 hours), for any level of traumatic brain injury in both high and low income settings. A comprehensive reference and citation analysis was performed. CPGs found were assessed using the AGREE II instrument by five independent reviewers and scores were aggregated and reported in percentage of total possible score. An initial 2742 articles were evaluated with an additional 98 articles from the citation and reference analysis, yielding 273 full texts examined. A total of 24 final CPGs were included, of which 23 were from high income countries (HIC) and 1 from LMIC. Based on the AGREE II instrument, the best score on overall assessment was 100.0 for the CPG from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NIHCE, 2007), followed by the New Zealand Guidelines Group (NZ, 2006) and the National Clinical Guideline (SIGN, 2009) both with a score of 96.7. The CPG from a LMIC had lower scores than CPGs from higher income settings. Our study identified and evaluated 24 CPGs with the highest scores in clarity and presentation, scope and purpose, and rigor of development. Most of these CPGs were developed in HICs, with limited applicability or utility for resource limited settings. Stakeholder involvement, Applicability, and Editorial independence remain weak and insufficiently described specifically with piloting, addressing potential costs and implementation barriers, and auditing for quality improvement.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0161554(source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Quality_of_the_Development_of_Traumatic_Brain_Injury_Clinical_Practice_Guidelines_A_Systematic_Review/3800565)。

数据缺失?

依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。

⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。

获取专属数据定制方案