新型阴茎包皮环切缝合器械与商环用于成人男性包皮环切术的前瞻性研究

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Novel penile circumcision suturing devices versus the shang ring for adult male circumcision: a prospective study
• DOI：10.6084/m9.figshare.5670211.v1
• 发布日期：2017-12-05
• 文件数：5 个
• 文件总体积：504.68 KB
• 源站页面：https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Novel_penile_circumcision_suturing_devices_versus_the_shang_ring_for_adult_male_circumcision_a_prospective_study/5670211

命令行下载

curl -L -o "1677-5538-ibju-43-04-0736-gf01.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/9910738"
curl -L -o "1677-5538-ibju-43-04-0736-gf02.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/9910741"
curl -L -o "1677-5538-ibju-43-04-0736-gf03.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/9910744"
curl -L -o "Table_1.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/9910747"
curl -L -o "Table_2.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/9910750"

文件清单

• 1677-5538-ibju-43-04-0736-gf01.jpg（295.22 KB）
• 1677-5538-ibju-43-04-0736-gf02.jpg（100.08 KB）
• 1677-5538-ibju-43-04-0736-gf03.jpg（98.12 KB）
• Table_1.xls（5.63 KB）
• Table_2.xls（5.63 KB）

文件总体积 504.68 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

ABSTRACT Introduction To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel penile circumcision suturing devices PCSD and Shang ring (SR) for circumcision in an adult population. Materials and Methods A total of 124 outpatients were randomly assigned to receive PCSD (n=62) or SR (n=62). Patient characteristics, operative time, blood loss, return to normal activities time (RNAT), visual analogue scale (VAS), scar width, wound healing time, cosmetic result, and complications were recorded. Results There were no significant differences in blood loss, RNAT, or complications between the two groups. There were no significant differences in the VAS scores at the operation, at 6 or 24 hours after surgery (P>0.05). The wound scar width was wider in the SR group than in the PCSD group (P<0.01). Patients in the SR group had significantly longer wound healing time compared with those in the PCSD group (P<0.01). Patients who underwent PCSD were significantly more satisfied with the cosmetic results (P<0.01). Conclusions SR and PCSD are safe and effective minimally invasive techniques for adult male circumcision. Compared with SRs, PCSDs have the advantages of faster postoperative incision healing and a good effect on wound cosmetics.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.5670211.v1（source: https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Novel_penile_circumcision_suturing_devices_versus_the_shang_ring_for_adult_male_circumcision_a_prospective_study/5670211）。