柔性可导航吸引输尿管通路鞘与传统输尿管通路鞘在逆行肾内手术中比较的系统综述与荟萃分析数据集
该数据集包含比较FANS-UAS与传统输尿管通路鞘在逆行肾内手术中疗效和安全性的系统综述与荟萃分析汇总数据。

基本信息
资源简介
柔性可导航吸引输尿管通路鞘与传统输尿管通路鞘在逆行肾内手术中比较的系统综述与荟萃分析数据集
【一句话概览】
本数据集是 figshare 公开的结构化表格数据集,收录 2 个文件、合计 34.21 KB,主题涵盖 Kidney stones、FURS (Flexible Ureteroscopy)、RIRS (Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery)、Nephrolithiasis,可用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析,CC BY 许可开放获取。
【数据集背景】
本数据集源站标题为《Comparison of flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) versus traditional ureteric access sheath in RIRS: A systematic review and meta analysis》。配套论文《Comparison of flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) versus traditional ureteric access sheath in RIRS: A systematic review and meta analysis》发表于 Arab Journal of Urology(2025),DOI:10.1080/20905998.2025.2569960。源站首次发布:2025-10-09。
【数据内容】
源站原始描述:Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is a cornerstone in the treatment of nephrolithiasis. The flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS-UAS) is a recent innovation designed to improve upon the traditional ureteral access sheath (T-UAS) by offering enhanced maneuverability and active stone fragment removal. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of FANS-UAS versus T-UAS in patients undergoing RIRS. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systema…
【数据结构与技术规格】
文件数 2 个,合计 34.21 KB。taju_a_2569960_sm8771.docx:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document,13.64 KB。taju_a_2569960_sm8769.docx:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document,20.56 KB。数据集 DOI:10.6084/m9.figshare.30317299.v1。
【主题与分类】
源站学科分类:Medicine、Cell Biology、Genetics、Sociology、Immunology、Developmental Biology。主题标签:Kidney stones、FURS (Flexible Ureteroscopy)、RIRS (Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery)、Nephrolithiasis。
【适用方向】
结构化表格数据可直接用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析。
【获取与许可】
源站页面:https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Comparison_of_flexible_and_navigable_suction_ureteral_access_sheath_FANS_versus_traditional_ureteric_access_sheath_in_RIRS_A_systematic_review_and_meta_analysis/30317299
使用许可:CC BY(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。
规范引用:Comparison of flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) versus traditional ureteric access sheath in RIRS: A systematic review and meta analysis. Taylor & Francis. Kadian, Bhopesh; Sunny, Bibin; Kumar, Arvind; Jaidiya, Jeetendra; Vinayaka, H J; Singh, Saurabh
下载信息
注册下载
需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。
暂未开放公开下载
无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。
免登录有偿下载
公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。
提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)
暂未开放当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。
使用方式
数据集获取(Figshare)
- 源站标题:Comparison of flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) versus traditional ureteric access sheath in RIRS: A systematic review and meta analysis
- DOI:10.6084/m9.figshare.30317299.v1
- 发布日期:2025-10-09
- 文件数:2 个
- 文件总体积:34.21 KB
- 源站页面:https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Comparison_of_flexible_and_navigable_suction_ureteral_access_sheath_FANS_versus_traditional_ureteric_access_sheath_in_RIRS_A_systematic_review_and_meta_analysis/30317299
命令行下载
curl -L -o "taju_a_2569960_sm8771.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/58597282"
curl -L -o "taju_a_2569960_sm8769.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/58597285"
文件清单
taju_a_2569960_sm8771.docx(13.64 KB)taju_a_2569960_sm8769.docx(20.56 KB)
文件总体积 34.21 KB(源站 API 实测)。
数据加载示例(图像类)
from PIL import Image
import glob, os
files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
+ glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
+ glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)
# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path) # 要求 子目录=类别
目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。
数据说明
Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is a cornerstone in the treatment of nephrolithiasis. The flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS-UAS) is a recent innovation designed to improve upon the traditional ureteral access sheath (T-UAS) by offering enhanced maneuverability and active stone fragment removal. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of FANS-UAS versus T-UAS in patients undergoing RIRS.
Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed and Scopus, for studies published up to May 2025. The review included studies comparing FANS-UAS and T-UAS in adult patients undergoing flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stone treatment. The primary outcomes analyzed were the stone-free rate (SFR), operative parameters, and postoperative complications. A random-effects model was used to pool data, with relative risk (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous variables.
Sixteen studies involving 3,342 patients were included. The FANS-UAS group demonstrated a significantly higher stone-free rate (SFR) at immediate, one-month, and three-month follow-ups (e.g. immediate SFR: RR = 1.42; p p p = 0.02), re-intervention (RR = 0.44; p = 0.01), and total complications (RR = 0.47; p This meta-analysis suggests that FANS-UAS provides superior stone clearance and is associated with a significantly better safety profile compared to T-UAS. Despite these promising findings, the conclusions are limited by the low quality of the included studies and the presence of significant heterogeneity and publication bias. Therefore, high-quality RCTs are warranted to corroborate these results.
许可
CC BY
引用
学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.30317299.v1(source: https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Comparison_of_flexible_and_navigable_suction_ureteral_access_sheath_FANS_versus_traditional_ureteric_access_sheath_in_RIRS_A_systematic_review_and_meta_analysis/30317299)。
数据缺失?
依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。
⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。




