刷子、字节与机器人:AI生成的儿科牙科建议质量比较
包含儿科牙科专家对ChatGPT、Gemini和Copilot生成的牙科建议质量评估的表格数据,涵盖五个质量维度。

基本信息
资源简介
刷子、字节与机器人:AI生成的儿科牙科建议质量比较
【一句话概览】
本数据集是 figshare 公开的结构化表格数据集,收录 1 个文件、合计 687.72 KB,主题涵盖 artificial intelligence、pediatric dentistry、parental guidance、ChatGPT、Google Gemini,可用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析,CC BY 4.0 许可开放获取。
【数据集背景】
本数据集源站标题为《Table 1_Brush, byte, and bot: quality comparison of artificial intelligence-generated pediatric dental advice across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Copilot.docx》。配套论文《Evaluating the Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Based Chatbots on Pediatric Dentistry Questions in the Korean National Dental Board Exam》发表于 THE JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ACADEMY OF PEDTATRIC DENTISTRY(2024),DOI:10.5933/JKAPD.2024.51.3.299。源站首次发布:2025-08-15。
【数据内容】
源站原始描述:IntroductionArtificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Microsoft Copilot are increasingly relied upon by parents for immediate guidance on pediatric dental concerns. This study evaluated and compared the response quality of these AI platforms in addressing real-world parental queries related to pediatric dentistry, including early tooth extraction, space maintenance, and the decision to consult a pediatric or a general dentist. MethodsA structured 30-question survey w…
【数据结构与技术规格】
文件数 1 个,合计 687.72 KB。Table 1_Brush, byte, and bot: quality comparison of artificial intelligence-generated pediatric dental advice across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Copilot.docx:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document,687.72 KB。数据集 DOI:10.3389/froh.2025.1652422.s001。
【主题与分类】
源站学科分类:Medicine。主题标签:artificial intelligence、pediatric dentistry、parental guidance、ChatGPT、Google Gemini、Microsoft Copilot、response quality。
【适用方向】
结构化表格数据可直接用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析。
【获取与许可】
源站页面:https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Table_1_Brush_byte_and_bot_quality_comparison_of_artificial_intelligence-generated_pediatric_dental_advice_across_ChatGPT_Gemini_and_Copilot_docx/29918108
使用许可:CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。
规范引用:Kapoor, Deepika; Garg, Deepanshu; Tadakamadla, Santosh Kumar (2025). Table 1_Brush, byte, and bot: quality comparison of artificial intelligence-generated pediatric dental advice across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Copilot.docx. Frontiers. Dataset
下载信息
注册下载
需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。
暂未开放公开下载
无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。
免登录有偿下载
公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。
提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)
暂未开放当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。
使用方式
数据集获取(Figshare)
- 源站标题:Table 1_Brush, byte, and bot: quality comparison of artificial intelligence-generated pediatric dental advice across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Copilot.docx
- DOI:10.3389/froh.2025.1652422.s001
- 发布日期:2025-08-15
- 文件数:1 个
- 文件总体积:687.72 KB
- 源站页面:https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Table_1_Brush_byte_and_bot_quality_comparison_of_artificial_intelligence-generated_pediatric_dental_advice_across_ChatGPT_Gemini_and_Copilot_docx/29918108
命令行下载
curl -L -o "Table 1_Brush, byte, and bot: quality comparison of artificial intelligence-generated pediatric dental advice across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Copilot.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/57204773"
文件清单
Table 1_Brush, byte, and bot: quality comparison of artificial intelligence-generated pediatric dental advice across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Copilot.docx(687.72 KB)
文件总体积 687.72 KB(源站 API 实测)。
数据加载示例(图像类)
from PIL import Image
import glob, os
files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
+ glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
+ glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)
# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path) # 要求 子目录=类别
目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。
数据说明
IntroductionArtificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Microsoft Copilot are increasingly relied upon by parents for immediate guidance on pediatric dental concerns. This study evaluated and compared the response quality of these AI platforms in addressing real-world parental queries related to pediatric dentistry, including early tooth extraction, space maintenance, and the decision to consult a pediatric or a general dentist.
MethodsA structured 30-question survey was developed and submitted to each AI model, and their responses were anonymized and assessed by pediatric dental experts using a standardized rubric across five key domains: clinical accuracy, clarity, completeness, relevance, and absence of misleading information.
ResultsStatistically significant differences were found across all five domains (p While AI technologies show potential as clinical decision support systems, their variable performance reinforces the need for expert oversight. Future AI development should focus on optimizing response quality and safety to ensure effective and trustworthy digital health communication for pediatric dental care.
许可
CC BY 4.0
引用
学术使用请引用 DOI 10.3389/froh.2025.1652422.s001(source: https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Table_1_Brush_byte_and_bot_quality_comparison_of_artificial_intelligence-generated_pediatric_dental_advice_across_ChatGPT_Gemini_and_Copilot_docx/29918108)。
数据缺失?
依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。
⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。




