医疗椅中的人工智能:脊柱裂咨询场景下AI模型的科学准确性、范围及可读性评估

该数据集包含20个关于孕期脊柱裂的常见问题及三种AI模型的回答、专家评分和可读性分析,用于评估AI在临床咨询中的科学准确性、范围和可读性。

ÖZGÜN, NEZİR; Akbaş, HümeyraÖZGÜN, NEZİR; Akbaş, Hümeyra
Figshare
2025-07-30 更新
浏览 22
文本Artificial IntelligenceConsultant PhysicianSpina BifidaPrenatal CounselingPatient EducationHealth Information Quality
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE MEDICAL CHAIR: A SCENARIO-BASED CURRENT EVALUATION ON SCIENTIFIC ACCURACY, SCOPE, AND READABILITY

基本信息

模态
文本
大小
0.000110157 GB
许可
CC BY 4.0
创建/更新时间
2025-07-30
版本
v1

资源简介

医疗椅中的人工智能:脊柱裂咨询场景下AI模型的科学准确性、范围及可读性评估

【数据集背景】

本数据集源站标题为《ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE MEDICAL CHAIR: A SCENARIO-BASED CURRENT EVALUATION ON SCIENTIFIC ACCURACY, SCOPE, AND READABILITY》。项目资助方:This study received no financial support.。源站首次发布:2025-07-30。

【数据内容】

源站原始描述:This study aims to evaluate the potential use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in clinical consultations, based on a scenario involving a pregnancy diagnosed with Spina Bifida (SB) during the intrauterine period. Twenty frequently asked questions from parents were submitted in Turkish to three different AI models (ChatGPT, Grok, and Gemini). The responses generated by each model were evaluated by two perinatology experts using the JAMA criteria, Global Quality Score, Modified DISCERN, Liker…

【数据结构与技术规格】

文件数 6 个,合计 110.16 KB。Spina bifida ile ilgili Yapay Zekaya sorulan 20 soru.docx:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document,23.29 KB。chatgpt.docx:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document,20.06 KB。grok.docx:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document,17.57 KB。数据集 DOI:10.6084/m9.figshare.29673098.v1。

【主题与分类】

源站学科分类:Digital health、General practice、Health and community services、Health counselling、Health management、Health systems。主题标签:Artificial Intelligence、Consultant Physician、Spina Bifida、Prenatal Counseling、Patient Education、Health Information Quality。

【适用方向】

文本类数据可用于医学自然语言处理,如命名实体识别、信息抽取与文本分类。

【获取与许可】

源站页面:https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/ARTIFICIAL_INTELLIGENCE_IN_THE_MEDICAL_CHAIR_A_SCENARIO-BASED_CURRENT_EVALUATION_ON_SCIENTIFIC_ACCURACY_SCOPE_AND_READABILITY/29673098

使用许可:CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。

规范引用:Akbaş, Hümeyra; ÖZGÜN, NEZİR (2025). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE MEDICAL CHAIR: A SCENARIO-BASED CURRENT EVALUATION ON SCIENTIFIC ACCURACY, SCOPE, AND READABILITY. figshare. Dataset

官方服务

专家保障全链路合规授权与标注交付

陕川双基地 × 超十家三甲医院直连

从合规授权、采集治理、专业标注到数据集交付,我们提供全链路闭环服务,让高质量临床数据即拿即用。

⚡️ 需要原始数据或标注支持?联系我们获取定制方案。

帮我联系

下载信息

注册下载

需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。

暂未开放

公开下载

无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。

免登录

有偿下载

公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。

提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)

暂未开放

当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。

使用方式

数据集获取(Figshare)

命令行下载

curl -L -o "Spina bifida ile ilgili Yapay Zekaya sorulan 20 soru.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/56657711"
curl -L -o "chatgpt.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/56657714"
curl -L -o "grok.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/56657717"
curl -L -o "gemini.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/56657720"
curl -L -o "Spina_Bifida_Cevap_Degerlendirme_Sablonu (1).xlsx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/56657723"
curl -L -o "okunabilirlik analizi tablolar ve yorum.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/56657942"

文件清单

  • Spina bifida ile ilgili Yapay Zekaya sorulan 20 soru.docx(23.29 KB)
  • chatgpt.docx(20.06 KB)
  • grok.docx(17.57 KB)
  • gemini.docx(21.84 KB)
  • Spina_Bifida_Cevap_Degerlendirme_Sablonu (1).xlsx(10.33 KB)
  • okunabilirlik analizi tablolar ve yorum.docx(17.07 KB)

文件总体积 110.16 KB(源站 API 实测)。

数据说明

This study aims to evaluate the potential use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in clinical consultations, based on a scenario involving a pregnancy diagnosed with Spina Bifida (SB) during the intrauterine period. Twenty frequently asked questions from parents were submitted in Turkish to three different AI models (ChatGPT, Grok, and Gemini). The responses generated by each model were evaluated by two perinatology experts using the JAMA criteria, Global Quality Score, Modified DISCERN, Likert Scale, and the Ateşman Readability Formula. These evaluations focused on scientific accuracy, reliability, overall quality, readability, and interpretability.
The dataset provided in this Excel file includes the 20 questions, the AI-generated responses, readability analysis results, and expert scoring based on the aforementioned scales.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.29673098.v1(source: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/ARTIFICIAL_INTELLIGENCE_IN_THE_MEDICAL_CHAIR_A_SCENARIO-BASED_CURRENT_EVALUATION_ON_SCIENTIFIC_ACCURACY_SCOPE_AND_READABILITY/29673098)。

数据缺失?

依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。

⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。

获取专属数据定制方案