非临床环境中偏头痛诊断工具验证研究的系统综述

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Validation studies on migraine diagnostic tools for use in nonclinical settings: a systematic review
• DOI：10.6084/m9.figshare.23300522.v1
• 发布日期：2023-06-06
• 文件数：6 个
• 文件总体积：1.89 MB
• 源站页面：https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Validation_studies_on_migraine_diagnostic_tools_for_use_in_nonclinical_settings_a_systematic_review/23300522

命令行下载

curl -L -o "4eb33a76883da26a9be3ada66c97e9d4cdc4c38b.tif" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/41072549"
curl -L -o "1929a299c0ac323d7c2544eb0a6aadd09c2c9d45.png" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/41072552"
curl -L -o "b2f528d12890d4c19e50f0bbb89a7c50b781adec.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/41072555"
curl -L -o "7645c61a733a74417df7f15c7218002b94b13834.tif" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/41072558"
curl -L -o "35fb2345c00b2802d49d31b78f3c7b8f6a2a29b2.png" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/41072561"
curl -L -o "81356a7d5c411f5f441647bbd9016f28af545086.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/41072564"

文件清单

• 4eb33a76883da26a9be3ada66c97e9d4cdc4c38b.tif（1.02 MB）
• 1929a299c0ac323d7c2544eb0a6aadd09c2c9d45.png（179.45 KB）
• b2f528d12890d4c19e50f0bbb89a7c50b781adec.jpg（4.82 KB）
• 7645c61a733a74417df7f15c7218002b94b13834.tif（587.28 KB）
• 35fb2345c00b2802d49d31b78f3c7b8f6a2a29b2.png（91.17 KB）
• 81356a7d5c411f5f441647bbd9016f28af545086.jpg（6.25 KB）

文件总体积 1.89 MB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Abstract Background Migraine underdiagnosis and undertreatment are so widespread, that hence is essential to diagnose migraine sufferers in nonclinical settings. A systematic review of validation studies on migraine diagnostic tools applicable to nonclinical settings can help researchers and practitioners in tool selection decisions. Objective To systematically review and critically assess published validation studies on migraine diagnostic tools for use in nonclinical settings, as well as to describe their diagnostic performance. Methods A multidisciplinary workgroup followed transparent and systematic procedures to collaborate on this work. PubMed, Medline, and Web of Science were searched for studies up to January 17, 2022. The QUADAS-2 was employed to assess methodological quality, and the quality thresholds adopted by the Global Burden Disease study were used to tail signaling questions. Results From 7,214 articles identified, a total of 27 studies examining 19 tools were eligible for inclusion. There has been no high-quality evidence to support any tool for use of migraine diagnosis in nonclinical settings. The diagnostic accuracy of the ID-migraine, structured headache and HARDSHIP questionnaires have been supported by moderate-quality evidence, with sensitivity and specificity above 70%. Of them, the HARDSHIP questionnaire has been the most extensively validated. The remaining 16 tools have provided poor-quality evidence for migraine diagnosis in nonclinical populations. Conclusions Up till now, the HARDSHIP questionnaire is the optimal choice for diagnosing migraine in nonclinical settings, with satisfactory diagnostic accuracy supported by moderate methodological quality. This work reveals the crucial next step, which is further high-quality validation studies in diverse nonclinical population groups.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.23300522.v1（source: https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Validation_studies_on_migraine_diagnostic_tools_for_use_in_nonclinical_settings_a_systematic_review/23300522）。