Patient and provider future recommendations
收集患者和医生对结直肠癌筛查中血液检测看法的定性访谈文本数据。

基本信息
资源简介
Patient and provider future recommendations
【数据集背景】
本数据集源站标题为《Patient and provider future recommendations.》。配套论文《“I was screaming hallelujah”: Patient and provider perceptions of blood-based testing for colorectal cancer screening》发表于 PLOS ONE(2023),DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0295685。源站首次发布:2023-12-21。
【数据内容】
源站原始描述:Background Blood-based tests for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening can offer many advantages over stool-based tests such as FIT. Yet, we know little about patients’ and providers’ perceptions of this type of test. We report findings from a qualitative study comparing patient and provider perceptions of blood-based testing for CRC screening. Methods Patient participants were aged 45–75 years and members of a large, integrated health system. Participants were mailed, but did not complete, a FIT th…
【数据结构与技术规格】
文件数 1 个,合计 9.73 KB。Table 2.xls:application/vnd.ms-excel,9.73 KB。数据集 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0295685.t002。
【主题与分类】
源站学科分类:Genetics、Biotechnology、Infectious Diseases。主题标签:used purposive sampling、structured interview guide、offer many advantages、nine clinical sites、high perceived accuracy、future research focusing、patients &# 8217、interviewed 15 patients、providers &# 8217、integrated health system。
【适用方向】
文本类数据可用于医学自然语言处理,如命名实体识别、信息抽取与文本分类。
【获取与许可】
源站页面:https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Patient_and_provider_future_recommendations_/24889867
使用许可:CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。
规范引用:Schneider, Jennifer L.; Johnson, Cheryl A.; Jenkins, Charisma; Mummadi, Rajasekhara; Coronado, Gloria D. (2023). Patient and provider future recommendations.. PLOS ONE. Dataset
下载信息
注册下载
需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。
暂未开放公开下载
无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。
免登录有偿下载
公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。
提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)
暂未开放当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。
使用方式
数据集获取(Figshare)
- 源站标题:Patient and provider future recommendations.
- DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0295685.t002
- 发布日期:2023-12-21
- 文件数:1 个
- 文件总体积:9.73 KB
- 源站页面:https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Patient_and_provider_future_recommendations_/24889867
命令行下载
curl -L -o "Table 2.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/43798966"
文件清单
Table 2.xls(9.73 KB)
文件总体积 9.73 KB(源站 API 实测)。
数据加载示例(图像类)
from PIL import Image
import glob, os
files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
+ glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
+ glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)
# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path) # 要求 子目录=类别
目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。
数据说明
Background
Blood-based tests for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening can offer many advantages over stool-based tests such as FIT. Yet, we know little about patients’ and providers’ perceptions of this type of test. We report findings from a qualitative study comparing patient and provider perceptions of blood-based testing for CRC screening.
Methods
Patient participants were aged 45–75 years and members of a large, integrated health system. Participants were mailed, but did not complete, a FIT through an organized FIT-screening program and were scheduled for a health-care encounter at any of nine clinical sites. Participants were consented to complete a blood draw. We used purposive sampling to select and recruit patients (who did and did not complete the blood test) and providers/specialists who would be involved in offering the blood test to patients or explaining results. We administered telephone interviews using a semi-structured interview guide and recorded and transcribed all interviews, then coded and analyzed content.
Results
We interviewed 15 patients (11 completed and 4 did not complete the blood test) and 5 providers (3 primary care providers, one gastroenterologist (GI), and one GI medical assistant). Patients were enthusiastic about completing a blood test, citing the simplicity, ease, convenience, and high perceived accuracy of the test. Providers were also receptive to a blood-based option, if adequate test performance could be achieved and if they have information that informs patients about the pros and cons of blood-based screening versus other screening tests.
Conclusions
Patients and providers were willing and enthusiastic about blood-based CRC screening tests. Future research focusing on performance and communication is needed.
许可
CC BY 4.0
引用
学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0295685.t002(source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Patient_and_provider_future_recommendations_/24889867)。
数据缺失?
依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。
⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。




