Table_2_腹腔镜与开放肾部分切除术：手术、肿瘤学和功能结果的系统综述与荟萃分析

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Table_2_Laparoscopic Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Surgical, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes.docx
• DOI：10.3389/fonc.2020.583979.s002
• 发布日期：2020-10-29
• 文件数：1 个
• 文件总体积：20.95 KB
• 源站页面：https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Table_2_Laparoscopic_Versus_Open_Partial_Nephrectomy_A_Systemic_Review_and_Meta-Analysis_of_Surgical_Oncological_and_Functional_Outcomes_docx/13159379

命令行下载

curl -L -o "Table_2_Laparoscopic Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Surgical, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/25307171"

文件清单

• Table_2_Laparoscopic Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Surgical, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes.docx（20.95 KB）

文件总体积 20.95 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

PurposeTo summarize and analyze the current evidence about surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes between laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN).
Materials and MethodsThrough a systematical search of multiple scientific databases in March 2020, we performed a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis. Meanwhile, we assessed the quality of the relevant evidence according to the framework in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
ResultsA total of 26 studies with 8095 patients were included. There was no statistical difference between the LPN and OPN in the terms of operation time (p=0.13), intraoperative complications (p=0.94), recurrence (p=0.56), cancer-specific survival (p=0.72), disease-free survival (p=0.72), and variations of estimated glomerular filtration rate (p=0.31). The LPN group had significantly less estimated blood loss (PThis meta-analysis revealed that the LPN is a feasible and safe alternative to the OPN with comparable surgical, oncologic, and functional outcomes. However, the results should be applied prudently in the clinic because of the low quality of evidence. Further quality studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness LPN and its postoperative quality of life compared with OPN.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.3389/fonc.2020.583979.s002（source: https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Table_2_Laparoscopic_Versus_Open_Partial_Nephrectomy_A_Systemic_Review_and_Meta-Analysis_of_Surgical_Oncological_and_Functional_Outcomes_docx/13159379）。