表3_基于人群的癌症筛查对资源有限社区的经济负担：ESECC试验的经验教训.pdf

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Table_3_Economic Burden Conferred by Population-Level Cancer Screening on Resource-Limited Communities: Lessons From the ESECC Trial.pdf
• DOI：10.3389/fonc.2022.849368.s005
• 发布日期：2022-03-21
• 文件数：1 个
• 文件总体积：288.96 KB
• 源站页面：https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Table_3_Economic_Burden_Conferred_by_Population-Level_Cancer_Screening_on_Resource-Limited_Communities_Lessons_From_the_ESECC_Trial_pdf/19389011

命令行下载

curl -L -o "Table_3_Economic Burden Conferred by Population-Level Cancer Screening on Resource-Limited Communities: Lessons From the ESECC Trial.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/34442162"

文件清单

• Table_3_Economic Burden Conferred by Population-Level Cancer Screening on Resource-Limited Communities: Lessons From the ESECC Trial.pdf（288.96 KB）

文件总体积 288.96 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

ObjectivesUpper gastrointestinal (G.I.) cancer screening has been conducted in China for decades. However, the economic burden for treatment “intensively” occurred in advance due to screening in resource-limited communities remain unclear.
MethodsWe compared the treatment costs for upper G.I. cancers from the screening and control arms of a population-based randomized trial in a high-risk area for esophageal cancer (EC) in China based on claims data from the health insurance system in the local area which included whole population coverage.
ResultsThe average out-of-pocket cost per treatment of EC in the screening arm was lower than that in the control arm ($5,972 vs. $7,557). This difference was a consequence of down-staging from screening which resulted in lower cost therapy for earlier stage cancers. Moreover, this result is similar for cardial and non-cardial gastric cancer in the two study arms ($7,933 vs. $10,605). However, three times as many (103 vs. 36) families in the screening arm suffered catastrophic health expenditure for all cancer types. The overall treatment cost for all EC patients in the screening arm ($1,045,119) was 2.44 times that in the control arm ($428,292), and the ratio for cardial and non-cardial gastric cancer was 1.12 ($393,261 vs. $351,557).
ConclusionCancer treatment secondary to screening may triple the likelihood of catastrophic patient medical expenditure, and sharply increase the economic pressure on the local community, particularly for cancer types which are of high prevalence. Financial support for patients and the health insurance system should be taken into consideration when planning budgets for cancer screening programs in communities which are resource-limited.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.3389/fonc.2022.849368.s005（source: https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Table_3_Economic_Burden_Conferred_by_Population-Level_Cancer_Screening_on_Resource-Limited_Communities_Lessons_From_the_ESECC_Trial_pdf/19389011）。