比较重复经颅磁刺激与抗抑郁药物在新诊断重度抑郁症患者首次治疗失败后的成本效果分析——终身分析数据集

基于终身马尔可夫模型,比较rTMS与抗抑郁药在新诊断MDD患者首次治疗失败后的成本效果分析数据集。

Figshare
2017-10-27 更新
浏览 25
表格Major Depressive Disorderantidepressant medication trialantidepressant medicationsMedicare reimbursement dataMDDOne-way sensitivity analysistreatment costsQALYlifetime Markov simulation modelingCost effectiveness analysisprescription drug costway sensitivity analysis
Cost effectiveness analysis comparing repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to antidepressant medications after a first treatment failure for major depressive disorder in newly diagnosed patients – A lifetime analysis

基本信息

模态
表格
大小
0.001958001 GB
许可
CC BY 4.0
创建/更新时间
2017-10-27
版本
v1

资源简介

比较重复经颅磁刺激与抗抑郁药物在新诊断重度抑郁症患者首次治疗失败后的成本效果分析——终身分析数据集

【数据集背景】

本数据集源站标题为《Cost effectiveness analysis comparing repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to antidepressant medications after a first treatment failure for major depressive disorder in newly diagnosed patients – A lifetime analysis》。配套论文《Cost effectiveness analysis comparing repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to antidepressant medications after a first treatment failure for major depressive disorder in newly diagnosed patients – A lifetime analysis》发表于 PLOS ONE(2017),DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0186950。源站首次发布:2017-10-26。

【数据内容】

源站原始描述:Objective Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) commonly is used for the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) after patients have failed to benefit from trials of multiple antidepressant medications. No analysis to date has examined the cost-effectiveness of rTMS used earlier in the course of treatment and over a patients’ lifetime. Methods We used lifetime Markov simulation modeling to compare the direct costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) of rTMS and medication…

【数据结构与技术规格】

文件数 27 个,合计 1.96 MB。S1 Fig.pdf:application/pdf,62.06 KB。S2 Fig.pdf:application/pdf,133.94 KB。S3 Fig.pdf:application/pdf,133.53 KB。数据集 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0186950。

【主题与分类】

源站学科分类:Medicine、Pharmacology、Biotechnology、Cancer、Science Policy、Mental Health。主题标签:Major Depressive Disorder、antidepressant medication trial、antidepressant medications、lifetime analysis Objective Repetitive Transcranial、Medicare reimbursement data、MDD、One-way sensitivity analysis、treatment costs、QALY、lifetime Markov simulation modeling。

【适用方向】

结构化表格数据可直接用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析。

【获取与许可】

源站页面:https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Cost_effectiveness_analysis_comparing_repetitive_transcranial_magnetic_stimulation_to_antidepressant_medications_after_a_first_treatment_failure_for_major_depressive_disorder_in_newly_diagnosed_patients_A_lifetime_analysis/5542372

使用许可:CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。

规范引用:Voigt, Jeffrey; Carpenter, Linda; Leuchter, Andrew (2017). Cost effectiveness analysis comparing repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to antidepressant medications after a first treatment failure for major depressive disorder in newly diagnosed patients – A lifetime analysis. PLOS ONE. Datas…

【使用注意】

· 源站最后修改于 2023-06-03,引用时请注意版本时效。

官方服务

专家保障全链路合规授权与标注交付

陕川双基地 × 超十家三甲医院直连

从合规授权、采集治理、专业标注到数据集交付,我们提供全链路闭环服务,让高质量临床数据即拿即用。

⚡️ 需要原始数据或标注支持?联系我们获取定制方案。

帮我联系

下载信息

注册下载

需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。

暂未开放

公开下载

无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。

免登录

有偿下载

公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。

提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)

暂未开放

当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。

使用方式

数据集获取(Figshare)

命令行下载

curl -L -o "S1 Fig.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/9601612"
curl -L -o "S2 Fig.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/9601624"
curl -L -o "S3 Fig.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/9601666"
curl -L -o "S4 Fig.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/9601678"
curl -L -o "S5 Fig.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/9601711"
curl -L -o "S6 Fig.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/9601759"
curl -L -o "S7 Fig.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/9601777"
curl -L -o "S8 Fig.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/9601801"

文件清单

  • S1 Fig.pdf(62.06 KB)
  • S2 Fig.pdf(133.94 KB)
  • S3 Fig.pdf(133.53 KB)
  • S4 Fig.pdf(130.58 KB)
  • S5 Fig.pdf(124.33 KB)
  • S6 Fig.pdf(81.88 KB)
  • S7 Fig.pdf(83.75 KB)
  • S8 Fig.pdf(77.97 KB)
  • S9 Fig.pdf(82.86 KB)
  • S10 Fig.pdf(70.25 KB)
  • S11 Fig.pdf(68.93 KB)
  • S12 Fig.pdf(72.02 KB)
  • S13 Fig.pdf(69.28 KB)
  • S14 Fig.pdf(69.17 KB)
  • S15 Fig.pdf(68.47 KB)
  • S16 Fig.pdf(66.81 KB)
  • S17 Fig.pdf(65.90 KB)
  • S18 Fig.pdf(66.05 KB)
  • S19 Fig.pdf(62.61 KB)
  • S20 Fig.pdf(71.37 KB)

文件总体积 1.96 MB(源站 API 实测)。

数据加载示例(图像类)

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Objective
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) commonly is used for the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) after patients have failed to benefit from trials of multiple antidepressant medications. No analysis to date has examined the cost-effectiveness of rTMS used earlier in the course of treatment and over a patients’ lifetime.
Methods
We used lifetime Markov simulation modeling to compare the direct costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) of rTMS and medication therapy in patients with newly diagnosed MDD (ages 20–59) who had failed to benefit from one pharmacotherapy trial. Patients’ life expectancies, rates of response and remission, and quality of life outcomes were derived from the literature, and treatment costs were based upon published Medicare reimbursement data. Baseline costs, aggregate per year quality of life assessments (QALYs), Monte Carlo simulation, tornado analysis, assessment of dominance, and one way sensitivity analysis were also performed. The discount rate applied was 3%.
Results
Lifetime direct treatment costs, and QALYs identified rTMS as the dominant therapy compared to antidepressant medications (i.e., lower costs with better outcomes) in all age ranges, with costs/improved QALYs ranging from $2,952/0.32 (older patients) to $11,140/0.43 (younger patients). One-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the model was most sensitive to the input variables of cost per rTMS session, monthly prescription drug cost, and the number of rTMS sessions per year.
Conclusion
rTMS was identified as the dominant therapy compared to antidepressant medication trials over the life of the patient across the lifespan of adults with MDD, given current costs of treatment. These models support the use of rTMS after a single failed antidepressant medication trial versus further attempts at medication treatment in adults with MDD.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0186950(source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Cost_effectiveness_analysis_comparing_repetitive_transcranial_magnetic_stimulation_to_antidepressant_medications_after_a_first_treatment_failure_for_major_depressive_disorder_in_newly_diagnosed_patients_A_lifetime_analysis/5542372)。

数据缺失?

依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。

⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。

获取专属数据定制方案