外科可持续发展:乌干达慈善手术的健康、贫困与公平影响
评估乌干达外科肿瘤学慈善手术与政府政策的健康、财务和公平影响,采用扩展成本效果分析与基于代理仿真模型。

基本信息
资源简介
外科可持续发展:乌干达慈善手术的健康、贫困与公平影响
【一句话概览】
本数据集是 figshare 公开数据集,收录 2 个文件、合计 4.04 MB,主题涵盖 sensitivity analyses、Charitable Surgery、policy、Sustainable Development Goals、cost-effectiveness analysis,源站分类为 Medicine、Biotechnology、Geology、Developmental Biology,CC BY 4.0 许可开放获取。
【数据集背景】
本数据集源站标题为《Sustainable Development in Surgery: The Health, Poverty, and Equity Impacts of Charitable Surgery in Uganda》。配套论文《Sustainable Development in Surgery: The Health, Poverty, and Equity Impacts of Charitable Surgery in Uganda》发表于 PLOS ONE(2016),DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0168867。源站首次发布:2016-12-30。
【数据内容】
源站原始描述:Background The recently adopted Sustainable Development Goals call for the end of poverty and the equitable provision of healthcare. These goals are often at odds, however: health seeking can lead to catastrophic spending, an outcome for which cancer patients and the poor in resource-limited settings are at particularly high risk. How various health policies affect the additional aims of financial wellbeing and equity is poorly understood. This paper evaluates the health, financial, and equity i…
【数据结构与技术规格】
文件数 2 个,合计 4.04 MB。S1 Appendix.docx:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document,3.62 MB。S2 Appendix.docx:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document,423.59 KB。数据集 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0168867。
【主题与分类】
源站学科分类:Medicine、Biotechnology、Geology、Developmental Biology、Cancer、Mental Health。主题标签:sensitivity analyses、Charitable Surgery、policy、Sustainable Development Goals、cost-effectiveness analysis、risk protection、equity impacts、holistically address、cancer patients、oncology delivery。
【适用方向】
源站学科分类标注为 Medicine、Biotechnology、Geology、Developmental Biology、Cancer、Mental Health。
【获取与许可】
源站页面:https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Sustainable_Development_in_Surgery_The_Health_Poverty_and_Equity_Impacts_of_Charitable_Surgery_in_Uganda/4507289
使用许可:CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。
规范引用:Shrime, Mark G.; Sekidde, Serufusa; Linden, Allison; Cohen, Jessica L.; C. Weinstein, Milton; A. Salomon, Joshua (2016). Sustainable Development in Surgery: The Health, Poverty, and Equity Impacts of Charitable Surgery in Uganda. PLOS ONE. Dataset
【使用注意】
· 源站最后修改于 2023-05-31,引用时请注意版本时效。
下载信息
注册下载
需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。
暂未开放公开下载
无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。
免登录有偿下载
公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。
提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)
暂未开放当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。
使用方式
数据集获取(Figshare)
- 源站标题:Sustainable Development in Surgery: The Health, Poverty, and Equity Impacts of Charitable Surgery in Uganda
- DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0168867
- 发布日期:2016-12-30
- 文件数:2 个
- 文件总体积:4.04 MB
- 源站页面:https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Sustainable_Development_in_Surgery_The_Health_Poverty_and_Equity_Impacts_of_Charitable_Surgery_in_Uganda/4507289
命令行下载
curl -L -o "S1 Appendix.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/7290275"
curl -L -o "S2 Appendix.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/7290281"
文件清单
S1 Appendix.docx(3.62 MB)S2 Appendix.docx(423.59 KB)
文件总体积 4.04 MB(源站 API 实测)。
数据加载示例(图像类)
from PIL import Image
import glob, os
files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
+ glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
+ glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)
# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path) # 要求 子目录=类别
目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。
数据说明
Background
The recently adopted Sustainable Development Goals call for the end of poverty and the equitable provision of healthcare. These goals are often at odds, however: health seeking can lead to catastrophic spending, an outcome for which cancer patients and the poor in resource-limited settings are at particularly high risk. How various health policies affect the additional aims of financial wellbeing and equity is poorly understood. This paper evaluates the health, financial, and equity impacts of governmental and charitable policies for surgical oncology in a resource-limited setting.
Methods
Three charitable platforms for surgical oncology delivery in Uganda were compared to six governmental policies aimed at improving healthcare access. An extended cost-effectiveness analysis using an agent-based simulation model examined the numbers of lives saved, catastrophic expenditure averted, impoverishment averted, costs, and the distribution of benefits across the wealth spectrum.
Findings
Of the nine policies and platforms evaluated, two were able to provide simultaneous health and financial benefits efficiently and equitably: mobile surgical units and governmental policies that simultaneously address surgical scaleup, the cost of surgery, and the cost of transportation. Policies that only remove user fees are dominated, as is the commonly employed short-term “surgical mission trip”. These results are robust to scenario and sensitivity analyses.
Interpretation
The most common platforms for increasing access to surgical care appear unable to provide health and financial risk protection equitably. On the other hand, mobile surgical units, to date an underutilized delivery platform, are able to deliver surgical oncology in a manner that meets sustainable development goals by improving health, financial solvency, and equity. These platforms compare favorably with policies that holistically address surgical delivery and should be considered as countries strengthen health systems.
许可
CC BY 4.0
引用
学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0168867(source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Sustainable_Development_in_Surgery_The_Health_Poverty_and_Equity_Impacts_of_Charitable_Surgery_in_Uganda/4507289)。
数据缺失?
依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。
⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。




