质量评估

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Quality assessment.
• DOI：10.1371/journal.pone.0301116.s003
• 发布日期：2024-05-09
• 文件数：1 个
• 文件总体积：14.35 KB
• 源站页面：https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Quality_assessment_/25790013

命令行下载

curl -L -o "pone.0301116.s003.xlsx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/46222605"

文件清单

• pone.0301116.s003.xlsx（14.35 KB）

文件总体积 14.35 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（表格/文本类）

import pandas as pd, glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.csv"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tsv"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.xlsx"), recursive=True))
print("数据文件:", files)
df = pd.read_csv(files[0])
print(df.shape); print(df.columns.tolist()); print(df.head(3))

数据说明

Context
Patient portals, designed to give ready access to medical records, have led to important improvements in patient care. However, there is a downside: much of the information available on portals is not designed for lay people. Pathology reports are no exception. Access to complex reports often leaves patients confused, concerned and stressed. We conducted a systematic review to explore recommendations and guidelines designed to promote a patient centered approach to pathology reporting.
Design
In consultation with a research librarian, a search strategy was developed to identify literature regarding patient-centered pathology reports (PCPR). Terms such as “pathology reports,” “patient-centered,” and “lay-terms” were used. The PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases were searched during the first quarter of 2023. Studies were included if they were original research and in English, without date restrictions.
Results
Of 1,053 articles identified, 17 underwent a full-text review. Only 5 studies (≈0.5%) met eligibility criteria: two randomized trials; two qualitative studies; a patient survey of perceived utility of potential interventions. A major theme that emerged from the patient survey/qualitative studies is the need for pathology reports to be in simple, non-medical language. Major themes of the quantitative studies were that patients preferred PCPRs, and patients who received PCPRs knew and recalled their cancer stage/grade better than the control group.
Conclusion
Pathology reports play a vital role in the decision-making process for patient care. Yet, they are beyond the comprehension of most patients. No framework or guidelines exist for generating reports that deploy accessible language. PCPRs should be a focus of future interventions to improve patient care.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0301116.s003（source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Quality_assessment_/25790013）。