效应与参数分析

基于50项II期肿瘤临床试验的Meta分析数据集,评估基因组学个性化治疗对缓解率和生存期的影响。

NIAID Data Ecosystem
浏览 9
表格three reviewers extractedsignificant positive associationjournal impact factorpatients per armbased versus nonevaluated 50 studiesstudy design parametersprevious drug treatmentfinal data checkxlink "> studiescompare survival mediansxlink ">
Effects and parameters analysis

基本信息

模态
表格
大小
0.000013824 GB
许可
CC BY 4.0
创建/更新时间
2026-10-09
版本
v1

资源简介

效应与参数分析

【一句话概览】

本数据集是 figshare 公开的结构化表格数据集,收录 1 个文件、合计 13.82 KB,主题涵盖 three reviewers extracted、significant positive association、journal impact factor、patients per arm、based versus non,可用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析,CC BY 4.0 许可开放获取。

【数据集背景】

本数据集源站标题为《Effects and parameters analysis.》。源站首次发布:2025-09-26。

【数据内容】

源站原始描述:Background To date, no meta-analysis has studied the general outcomes of personalized cancer drug therapy with a focus on current targeted, immunotherapy, and multi-agent phase II clinical trials. Objective We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide a comprehensive overview of outcomes in patients undergoing personalized genomics-based versus non-personalized treatment in oncology. Data source We searched for publications in PubMed, dedicated to specific cancer drug treatment…

【数据结构与技术规格】

文件数 1 个,合计 13.82 KB。Table 2.xls:application/vnd.ms-excel,13.82 KB。数据集 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0332599.t002。

【主题与分类】

源站学科分类:Medicine、Biotechnology、Cancer、Science Policy、Infectious Diseases。主题标签:three reviewers extracted、significant positive association、journal impact factor、patients per arm、based versus non、evaluated 50 studies、study design parameters、previous drug treatment、final data check、compare survival medians。

【适用方向】

结构化表格数据可直接用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析。

【获取与许可】

源站页面:https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Effects_and_parameters_analysis_/30222781

使用许可:CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。

规范引用:Potievskiy, Mikhail B.; Zharova, Elena P.; Nekrasova, Lidia A.; Garifullin, Airat I.; Korobov, Ivan V.; Shevchenko, Nikita E.; et al. (2025). Effects and parameters analysis.. PLOS ONE. Dataset

官方服务

专家保障全链路合规授权与标注交付

陕川双基地 × 超十家三甲医院直连

从合规授权、采集治理、专业标注到数据集交付,我们提供全链路闭环服务,让高质量临床数据即拿即用。

⚡️ 需要原始数据或标注支持?联系我们获取定制方案。

帮我联系

下载信息

注册下载

需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。

暂未开放

公开下载

无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。

免登录

有偿下载

公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。

提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)

暂未开放

当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。

使用方式

数据集获取(Figshare)

命令行下载

curl -L -o "Table 2.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/58306609"

文件清单

  • Table 2.xls(13.82 KB)

文件总体积 13.82 KB(源站 API 实测)。

数据加载示例(图像类)

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Background
To date, no meta-analysis has studied the general outcomes of personalized cancer drug therapy with a focus on current targeted, immunotherapy, and multi-agent phase II clinical trials.
Objective
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide a comprehensive overview of outcomes in patients undergoing personalized genomics-based versus non-personalized treatment in oncology.
Data source
We searched for publications in PubMed, dedicated to specific cancer drug treatment and phase II clinical trials, and published from 2010 to 2021. The search dates were from 20.10.23 to 20.11.23. The final data check was on 20.12.23.
Selection criteria
Studies of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy were included. Only trials, including adults (more than 18 y.o.) were selected. The personalization was evaluated based on genetic markers and study design.
Data collection and analysis
The study was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Two reviewers worked independently to select studies and arms, and one checked the results. Three reviewers extracted the data, and another reviewer independently checked it. The proportional meta-analysis, random-effects model, and meta-regression were employed to evaluate the effects of genomics-based personalization and other study design parameters (randomization, multi-central protocol, pre-treatment, therapy type, number of patients per arm, and journal impact factor) on the treatment outcomes. Mann-Whitney was employed to compare survival medians, p Results
We evaluated 50 studies, having 81 arms and 6536 patients. Response Rate (RR) and 1-year Progression-Free Survival (PFS) were significantly higher in personalized arms (p = 0.009 and p = 0.011). Medians of PFS and Overall Survival (OS) were also higher in personalized arms (p = 0.018 and p = 0.032). Proportional meta-analysis and meta-regression detected a significant positive association between personalized treatment and RR (p = 0.037). The same results were obtained for 1-year PFS and OS rates (p = 0.043 and p = 0.022). Previous drug treatment, type of therapy (targeted therapy/immunotherapy/cytotoxic chemotherapy), study design, and journal impact

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0332599.t002(source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Effects_and_parameters_analysis_/30222781)。

数据缺失?

依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。

⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。

获取专属数据定制方案