普遍筛查与基于风险因素的筛查对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌（MRSA）的成本分析

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Cost Analysis of Universal Screening vs. Risk Factor-Based Screening for Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA)
• DOI：10.1371/journal.pone.0159667
• 发布日期：2016-07-27
• 文件数：4 个
• 文件总体积：510.46 KB
• 源站页面：https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Cost_Analysis_of_Universal_Screening_vs_Risk_Factor-Based_Screening_for_Methicillin-Resistant_i_Staphylococcus_aureus_i_MRSA_/3884478

命令行下载

curl -L -o "S1 Dataset.XLS" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/6088176"
curl -L -o "S1 STROBE Checklist.DOC" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/6088182"
curl -L -o "S1 Table.DOC" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/6088191"
curl -L -o "S2 Table.DOC" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/6088209"

文件清单

• S1 Dataset.XLS（296.96 KB）
• S1 STROBE Checklist.DOC（89.60 KB）
• S1 Table.DOC（61.44 KB）
• S2 Table.DOC（62.46 KB）

文件总体积 510.46 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Background
The literature remains conflicted regarding the most effective way to screen for MRSA. This study was designed to assess costs associated with universal versus risk factor-based screening for the reduction of nosocomial MRSA transmission.
Methods
The study was conducted at The Ottawa Hospital, a large multi-centre tertiary care facility with approximately 47,000 admissions annually. From January 2006-December 2007, patients underwent risk factor-based screening for MRSA on admission. From January 2008 to August 2009 universal MRSA screening was implemented. A comparison of costs incurred during risk factor-based screening and universal screening was conducted. The model incorporated probabilities relating to the likelihood of being tested and the results of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing with associated effects in terms of MRSA bacteremia and true positive and negative test results. Inputted costs included laboratory testing, contact precautions and infection control, private room costs, housekeeping, and length of hospital stay. Deterministic sensitivity analyses were conducted.
Results
The risk factor-based MRSA screening program screened approximately 30% of admitted patients and cost the hospital over $780 000 annually. The universal screening program screened approximately 83% of admitted patients and cost over $1.94 million dollars, representing an excess cost of $1.16 million per year. The estimated additional cost per patient screened was $17.76.
Conclusion
This analysis demonstrated that a universal MRSA screening program was costly from a hospital perspective and was previously known to not be clinically effective at reducing MRSA transmission. These results may be useful to inform future model-based economic analyses of MRSA interventions.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0159667（source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Cost_Analysis_of_Universal_Screening_vs_Risk_Factor-Based_Screening_for_Methicillin-Resistant_i_Staphylococcus_aureus_i_MRSA_/3884478）。