非ICU脓毒症集束治疗依从性改进计划数据集

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Data_Sheet_1_Effect of a quality improvement program on compliance to the sepsis bundle in non-ICU patients: a multicenter prospective before and after cohort study.docx
• DOI：10.3389/fmed.2023.1215341.s001
• 发布日期：2023-11-13
• 文件数：1 个
• 文件总体积：400.94 KB
• 源站页面：https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_Sheet_1_Effect_of_a_quality_improvement_program_on_compliance_to_the_sepsis_bundle_in_non-ICU_patients_a_multicenter_prospective_before_and_after_cohort_study_docx/24552376

命令行下载

curl -L -o "Data_Sheet_1_Effect of a quality improvement program on compliance to the sepsis bundle in non-ICU patients: a multicenter prospective before and afte.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/43127086"

文件清单

• Data_Sheet_1_Effect of a quality improvement program on compliance to the sepsis bundle in non-ICU patients: a multicenter prospective before and afte.docx（400.94 KB）

文件总体积 400.94 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

ObjectiveSepsis and septic shock are major challenges and economic burdens to healthcare, impacting millions of people globally and representing significant causes of mortality. Recently, a large number of quality improvement programs focused on sepsis resuscitation bundles have been instituted worldwide. These educational initiatives have been shown to be associated with improvements in clinical outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a multi-faceted quality implementing program (QIP) on the compliance of a “simplified 1-h bundle” (Sepsis 6) and hospital mortality of severe sepsis and septic shock patients out of the intensive care unit (ICU).
MethodsEmergency departments (EDs) and medical wards (MWs) of 12 academic and non-academic hospitals in the Lombardy region (Northern Italy) were involved in a multi-faceted QIP, which included educational and organizational interventions. Patients with a clinical diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock according to the Sepsis-2 criteria were enrolled in two different periods: from May 2011 to November 2011 (before-QIP cohort) and from August 2012 to June 2013 (after-QIP cohort).
Measurements and main resultsThe effect of QIP on bundle compliance and hospital mortality was evaluated in a before–after analysis. We enrolled 467 patients in the before-QIP group and 656 in the after-QIP group. At the time of enrollment, septic shock was diagnosed in 50% of patients, similarly between the two periods. In the after-QIP group, we observed increased compliance to the “simplified rapid (1 h) intervention bundle” (the Sepsis 6 bundle – S6) at three time-points evaluated (1 h, 13.7 to 18.7%, p = 0.018, 3 h, 37.1 to 48.0%, p = 0.013, overall study period, 46.2 to 57.9%, p A multi-faceted QIP aimed at promoting an early simplified bundle of care for the management of septic patients out of the ICU was associated with improved compliance with sepsis bundles and lower in-hospital mortality.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.3389/fmed.2023.1215341.s001（source: https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_Sheet_1_Effect_of_a_quality_improvement_program_on_compliance_to_the_sepsis_bundle_in_non-ICU_patients_a_multicenter_prospective_before_and_after_cohort_study_docx/24552376）。