透明抗菌敷料在重症监护室中心静脉和动脉导管管理中的成本效益分析

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Transparent Antimicrobial Dressing for Managing Central Venous and Arterial Catheters in Intensive Care Units
• DOI：10.1371/journal.pone.0130439
• 发布日期：2015-06-18
• 文件数：2 个
• 文件总体积：39.67 KB
• 源站页面：https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Cost_Effectiveness_Analysis_of_a_Transparent_Antimicrobial_Dressing_for_Managing_Central_Venous_and_Arterial_Catheters_in_Intensive_Care_Units_/1453835

命令行下载

curl -L -o "S1_Table.xlsx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/2125490"
curl -L -o "S2_Table.xlsx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/2125491"

文件清单

• S1_Table.xlsx（19.76 KB）
• S2_Table.xlsx（19.91 KB）

文件总体积 39.67 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Objective
To model the cost-effectiveness impact of routine use of an antimicrobial chlorhexidine gluconate-containing securement dressing compared to non-antimicrobial transparent dressings for the protection of central vascular lines in intensive care unit patients.
Design
This study uses a novel health economic model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of using the chlorhexidine gluconate dressing versus transparent dressings in a French intensive care unit scenario. The 30-day time non-homogeneous markovian model comprises eight health states. The probabilities of events derive from a multicentre (12 French intensive care units) randomized controlled trial. 1,000 Monte Carlo simulations of 1,000 patients per dressing strategy are used for probabilistic sensitivity analysis and 95% confidence intervals calculations. The outcome is the number of catheter-related bloodstream infections avoided. Costs of intensive care unit stay are based on a recent French multicentre study and the cost-effectiveness criterion is the cost per catheter-related bloodstream infections avoided. The incremental net monetary benefit per patient is also estimated.
Patients
1000 patients per group simulated based on the source randomized controlled trial involving 1,879 adults expected to require intravascular catheterization for 48 hours.
Intervention
Chlorhexidine Gluconate-containing securement dressing compared to non-antimicrobial transparent dressings.
Results
The chlorhexidine gluconate dressing prevents 11.8 infections /1,000 patients (95% confidence interval: [3.85; 19.64]) with a number needed to treat of 85 patients. The mean cost difference per patient of €141 is not statistically significant (95% confidence interval: [€-975; €1,258]). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is of €12,046 per catheter-related bloodstream infection prevented, and the incremental net monetary benefit per patient is of €344.88.
Conclusions
According to the base case scenario, the chlorhexidine gluconate dressing is more cost-effective than the reference dressing.
Trial Registration
This model is based on the data from the RCT registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01189682).

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0130439（source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Cost_Effectiveness_Analysis_of_a_Transparent_Antimicrobial_Dressing_for_Managing_Central_Venous_and_Arterial_Catheters_in_Intensive_Care_Units_/1453835）。