淋巴水肿相关短视频健康信息可靠性与质量横断面研究数据表

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Data Sheet 1_The reliability and quality of short videos as health information of guidance for lymphedema: a cross-sectional study.xlsx
• DOI：10.3389/fpubh.2024.1472583.s001
• 发布日期：2025-01-03
• 文件数：1 个
• 文件总体积：18.06 KB
• 源站页面：https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_Sheet_1_The_reliability_and_quality_of_short_videos_as_health_information_of_guidance_for_lymphedema_a_cross-sectional_study_xlsx/28128872

命令行下载

curl -L -o "Data Sheet 1_The reliability and quality of short videos as health information of guidance for lymphedema: a cross-sectional study.xlsx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/51460256"

文件清单

• Data Sheet 1_The reliability and quality of short videos as health information of guidance for lymphedema: a cross-sectional study.xlsx（18.06 KB）

文件总体积 18.06 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

BackgroundThe prevalence of lymphedema is rising, necessitating accurate diagnostic and treatment information for affected patients. Short video-sharing platforms facilitate access to such information but require validation regarding the reliability and quality of the content presented. This study aimed to assess the reliability and quality of lymphedema-related information on Chinese short video-sharing platforms.
MethodsWe collected 111 video samples addressing the diagnosis and treatment of lymphedema from four platforms: TikTok, Bilibili, WeChat, and Microblog. Two independent surgeons evaluated each video for content comprehensiveness, quality (using the Global Quality Score), and reliability (using the modified DISCERN tool). The videos from different sources were subsequently compared and analyzed.
ResultsOut of 111 videos analyzed, 66 (59.46%) were uploaded by medical professionals, including breast surgeons, vascular surgeons, plastic surgeons, physical therapists, and gynecologists, while 45 (40.54%) were shared by non-medical professionals such as science bloggers, medical institutions, and lymphedema patients. Patient-uploaded videos received the highest engagement, with median likes of 2,257 (IQR: 246.25–10998.25) and favorites of 399 (IQR: 94.5–1794.75). 13 videos (11.71%) contained inaccuracies. Medical professionals’ videos generally showed higher content comprehensiveness, particularly those by plastic surgeons, compared to non-medical professionals. The GQS and modified DISCERN tool were used to assess video quality and reliability respectively, with medical professionals scoring higher on both metrics (z = 3.127, p = 0.002; z = 2.010, p = 0.044). The quality and reliability of recommendations provided by plastic surgeons surpassed that of other medical professionals (χ2 = 16.196, p = 0.003; χ2 = 9.700, p = 0.046). No significant differences in video quality and reliability were found among the three categories of non-medical professionals (χ2 = 3.491, p = 0.175; χ2 = 2.098, p = 0.350).
ConclusionOur study shows that lymphedema-related videos on short video platforms vary widely in quality. Videos by medical professionals are generally more acc

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1472583.s001（source: https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_Sheet_1_The_reliability_and_quality_of_short_videos_as_health_information_of_guidance_for_lymphedema_a_cross-sectional_study_xlsx/28128872）。