用于评估上肢淋巴水肿的结果的系统综述

系统综述评估上肢淋巴水肿的评估方法和结果,分析了55项研究,指出需建立标准化评估协议。

Figshare
2018-10-25 更新
浏览 12
文本Supportive care & Symptom controlOutcomes ResearchBreast Cancers
A Systematic Review of the Outcomes Used to Assess Upper Body Lymphedema

基本信息

模态
文本
大小
0.00006448 GB
许可
CC BY 4.0
创建/更新时间
2018-10-25
版本
v1

资源简介

用于评估上肢淋巴水肿的结果的系统综述

【数据集背景】

本数据集源站标题为《A Systematic Review of the Outcomes Used to Assess Upper Body Lymphedema》。配套论文《A Systematic Review of the Outcomes Used to Assess Upper Body Lymphedema》发表于 Cancer Investigation(2018),DOI:10.1080/07357907.2018.1517362。项目资助方:The research received support from Sydney Research.。源站首次发布:2018-10-05。

【数据内容】

源站原始描述:Purpose: To ascertain how change in upper body lymphedema is assessed and understand how clinically significant change is determined. Method: A systematic search of the literature resulted in 55 eligible studies for analysis. Results: A range of assessment methods, measurement protocols, and outcomes were used in the literature. Of the 21 studies in which thresholds for change were set a priori, 20 different thresholds were reported. Conclusion: How data was measured, analysed and reported was i…

【数据结构与技术规格】

文件数 2 个,合计 64.48 KB。icnv_a_1517362_sm1237.docx:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document,15.64 KB。icnv_a_1517362_sm1236.docx:application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document,48.84 KB。数据集 DOI:10.6084/m9.figshare.7172426.v1。

【主题与分类】

源站学科分类:Medicine、Biotechnology、Chemical Sciences not elsewhere classified、Sociology、Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified。主题标签:Supportive care & Symptom control、Outcomes Research、Breast Cancers。

【适用方向】

文本类数据可用于医学自然语言处理,如命名实体识别、信息抽取与文本分类。

【获取与许可】

源站页面:https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/A_Systematic_Review_of_the_Outcomes_Used_to_Assess_Upper_Body_Lymphedema/7172426

使用许可:CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。

规范引用:A Systematic Review of the Outcomes Used to Assess Upper Body Lymphedema. Taylor & Francis. Sierla, Robyn; Dylke, Elizabeth Sian; Kilbreath, Sharon

【使用注意】

· 源站最后修改于 2023-10-05,引用时请注意版本时效。

官方服务

专家保障全链路合规授权与标注交付

陕川双基地 × 超十家三甲医院直连

从合规授权、采集治理、专业标注到数据集交付,我们提供全链路闭环服务,让高质量临床数据即拿即用。

⚡️ 需要原始数据或标注支持?联系我们获取定制方案。

帮我联系

下载信息

注册下载

需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。

暂未开放

公开下载

无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。

免登录

有偿下载

公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。

提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)

暂未开放

当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。

使用方式

数据集获取(Figshare)

命令行下载

curl -L -o "icnv_a_1517362_sm1237.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/13193471"
curl -L -o "icnv_a_1517362_sm1236.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/13193474"

文件清单

  • icnv_a_1517362_sm1237.docx(15.64 KB)
  • icnv_a_1517362_sm1236.docx(48.84 KB)

文件总体积 64.48 KB(源站 API 实测)。

数据说明

Purpose: To ascertain how change in upper body lymphedema is assessed and understand how clinically significant change is determined.
Method: A systematic search of the literature resulted in 55 eligible studies for analysis.
Results: A range of assessment methods, measurement protocols, and outcomes were used in the literature. Of the 21 studies in which thresholds for change were set a priori, 20 different thresholds were reported.
Conclusion: How data was measured, analysed and reported was inconsistent across studies. Consensus on a core outcome set with standardised assessment protocols and reporting; and investigation into empirically based minimum important differences (MID) is needed.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.7172426.v1(source: https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/A_Systematic_Review_of_the_Outcomes_Used_to_Assess_Upper_Body_Lymphedema/7172426)。

数据缺失?

依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。

⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。

获取专属数据定制方案