评估激光屈光手术患者教育网站的可读性、质量和视觉可访问性

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Assessing the Readability, Quality, and Visual Accessibility of Patient Education Websites for Laser Refractive Surgery
• DOI：10.6084/m9.figshare.28928899.v1
• 发布日期：2025-05-05
• 文件数：2 个
• 文件总体积：31.94 KB
• 源站页面：https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Assessing_the_Readability_Quality_and_Visual_Accessibility_of_Patient_Education_Websites_for_Laser_Refractive_Surgery/28928899

命令行下载

curl -L -o "iope_a_2500014_sm5102.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/54190408"
curl -L -o "iope_a_2500014_sm5097.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/54190411"

文件清单

• iope_a_2500014_sm5102.docx（15.55 KB）
• iope_a_2500014_sm5097.docx（16.38 KB）

文件总体积 31.94 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

To assess the usability of patient education websites for refractive surgery through an analysis of readability, accountability, subjective quality, and visual accessibility.
50 patient education websites for five refractive surgery modalities were gathered from an incognito Google search and categorized by authorship category: institutional, medical organization, or private practice. Each website was assessed for readability, accountability using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark, subjective quality using the DISCERN instrument, and visual accessibility was assessed using the Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool (WAVE).
The mean reading grade across all websites was 11.02, exceeding the American Medical Association’s recommended 6th-grade level (p p = 0.005) while private practice sites were the least (11.74, p = 0.015). The average JAMA score was 1.52 with no website meeting all four accountability criteria. Websites from medical organizations had significantly higher JAMA scores (1.94, p = 0.049). The average DISCERN score was 51.97 with no differences between authorship categories. Websites had an average of 87.84 visual accessibility violations.
Available patient education websites for refractive surgery may suffer from poor readability, quality, and visual accessibility which may limit their usability.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.28928899.v1（source: https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Assessing_the_Readability_Quality_and_Visual_Accessibility_of_Patient_Education_Websites_for_Laser_Refractive_Surgery/28928899）。