沙眼知识评估问卷效度与信度分析数据集

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Elaboration and validity and reliability analysis of a questionnaire to assess the knowledge of primary care physicians and nurses about trachoma
• DOI：10.6084/m9.figshare.14276870.v1
• 发布日期：2021-03-24
• 文件数：4 个
• 文件总体积：30.72 KB
• 源站页面：https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Elaboration_and_validity_and_reliability_analysis_of_a_questionnaire_to_assess_the_knowledge_of_primary_care_physicians_and_nurses_about_trachoma/14276870

命令行下载

curl -L -o "Table_1.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/27088025"
curl -L -o "Table_2.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/27088028"
curl -L -o "Table_3.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/27088031"
curl -L -o "Table_4.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/27088034"

文件清单

• Table_1.xls（5.63 KB）
• Table_2.xls（5.63 KB）
• Table_3.xls（5.63 KB）
• Table_4.xls（13.82 KB）

文件总体积 30.72 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Abstract Objective: To develop and analyze the validity and reliability of a questionnaire to assess the knowledge of primary care physicians and nurses about trachoma. Methods: This is a methodological study of elaboration and analysis of validity and reliability of an instrument (questionnaire). The following steps were developed: 1) identification of updated source literature on the subject; 2) elaboration of the questionnaire items by the researchers; 3) content validation by experts; 4) construct validation with instrument application and hypothesis test analysis; 5) internal consistency analysis and; 6) temporal stability analysis (test-retest). Results: The study included 205 primary health care physicians and nurses and 10 specialists in ophthalmology and infectology. The instrument, initially with 52 items, was left with 41 items after all stages. The instrument was able to adequately discriminate professionals with greater and lesser knowledge, according to the hypothesis test (p

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.14276870.v1（source: https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Elaboration_and_validity_and_reliability_analysis_of_a_questionnaire_to_assess_the_knowledge_of_primary_care_physicians_and_nurses_about_trachoma/14276870）。