澳大利亚眼保健专业人员对年龄相关性黄斑变性（AMD）护理观点的定性探索

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：A qualitative exploration of Australian eyecare professional perspectives on Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) care
• DOI：10.1371/journal.pone.0228858
• 发布日期：2020-02-11
• 文件数：5 个
• 文件总体积：127.42 KB
• 源站页面：https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/A_qualitative_exploration_of_Australian_eyecare_professional_perspectives_on_Age-Related_Macular_Degeneration_AMD_care/11838159

命令行下载

curl -L -o "pone.0228858.s001.doc" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/21679317"
curl -L -o "pone.0228858.s002.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/21679320"
curl -L -o "pone.0228858.s003.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/21679323"
curl -L -o "pone.0228858.s004.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/21679326"
curl -L -o "pone.0228858.s005.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/21679329"

文件清单

• pone.0228858.s001.doc（38.40 KB）
• pone.0228858.s002.docx（29.57 KB）
• pone.0228858.s003.docx（19.57 KB）
• pone.0228858.s004.docx（22.94 KB）
• pone.0228858.s005.docx（16.94 KB）

文件总体积 127.42 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Despite the existence of evidence-based recommendations to decrease risk and progression of Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) for some time, self-reported practices suggest that eyecare professionals’ advice and people with AMD’s adherence to these recommendations can be very poor. This study uses qualitative methods to explore Australian eyecare professionals’ perspective on barriers to effective AMD care. Seven focus groups involving 65 optometrists were conducted by an experienced facilitator. A nominal group technique was used to identify, prioritize and semi-quantify barriers and enablers to AMD care. Participants individually ranked their perceived top five barriers and enablers with the most important granted a score of 5 and the least important a score of 1. For each barrier or enabler, the number of votes it received and its total score were recorded. Barriers and enablers selected by at least one participant in their top 5 were then qualitatively analysed, grouped using thematic analysis and total score calculated for each consolidated barrier or enabler. In-depth individual interviews were conducted with 10 ophthalmologists and 2 optometrists. Contributions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed with NVivo software. One hundred and sixty-nine barriers and 51 enablers to AMD care were identified in the focus groups. Of these, 102 barriers and 42 enablers were selected as one of their top 5 by at least one participant and further consolidated into 16 barriers and 10 enablers after thematic analysis. Factors impacting AMD care identified through analysis of the transcripts were coded to three categories of influence: patient-centered, practitioner-centered, and structural factors. Eyecare professionals considered poor care pathways, people with AMD’s poor disease understanding / denial, and cost of care / lack of funding, as the most significant barriers to AMD care; they considered shared care model, access, and communication as the most significant enablers to good AMD care. These findings suggest that Australian eyecare professionals perceive that there is a need for improved patient support systems and appropriately funded, clear

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0228858（source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/A_qualitative_exploration_of_Australian_eyecare_professional_perspectives_on_Age-Related_Macular_Degeneration_AMD_care/11838159）。