无针注射器与胰岛素笔治疗糖尿病的meta分析数据集

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Efficacy, safety, and patient-centered outcomes of needle-free injectors versus insulin pens in diabetes management: a comprehensive meta-analysis
• DOI：10.6084/m9.figshare.30870640.v1
• 发布日期：2025-12-12
• 文件数：2 个
• 文件总体积：1.14 MB
• 源站页面：https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Efficacy_safety_and_patient-centered_outcomes_of_needle-free_injectors_versus_insulin_pens_in_diabetes_management_a_comprehensive_meta-analysis/30870640

命令行下载

curl -L -o "idrd_a_2597906_sm3159.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/60323491"
curl -L -o "idrd_a_2597906_sm3158.xlsx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/60323494"

文件清单

• idrd_a_2597906_sm3159.docx（1.11 MB）
• idrd_a_2597906_sm3158.xlsx（27.58 KB）

文件总体积 1.14 MB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

To evaluate the comparative effectiveness, safety, and patient acceptance of needle-free injectors and insulin pens through a meta-analysis. A thorough literature search was performed across multiple databases, including CNKI, the Weipu Database, the Wanfang Database, PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the use of needle-free injectors and insulin pens in diabetes treatment, with a time frame from database inception until June 2024. Five researchers carefully screened the literature in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, assessed study quality with validated tools and conducted the meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4. This study included 22 publications encompassing 22 studies, involving a total of 2,580 patients, with 1,290 in the needle-free group and 1,290 in the insulin pen group. The findings suggest that needle-free injectors were superior to insulin pens in improving treatment efficacy, local adverse reactions, and increasing patient acceptability, with statistically significant differences. However, no significant variations were observed in continuous glucose monitoring. Needle-free injectors can improve certain aspects of glycemic control, such as reducing HbA1c, FPG, and 2hPPG; improve local adverse reactions and increase patient acceptability. However, improvements in glycemic variability metrics were not statistically significant, indicating that further research is needed to fully assess their long-term safety and therapeutic effectiveness. In terms of systemic safety, the risk of hypoglycemia in the needle-free group was not significantly different from that in the needle group (P = 0.14). Additionally, our publication bias analysis revealed potential biases in the outcomes related to hypoglycemia and insulin dosage.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.30870640.v1（source: https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Efficacy_safety_and_patient-centered_outcomes_of_needle-free_injectors_versus_insulin_pens_in_diabetes_management_a_comprehensive_meta-analysis/30870640）。