急性胆囊炎紧急与择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的死亡率

巴西2009-2014年腹腔镜胆囊切除术死亡率数据,比较紧急与择期手术对急性胆囊炎死亡率的影响。

SciELO journalsSciELO journals
DataCite Commons
2022-06-02 更新
浏览 28
表格Laparoscopic cholecystectomyCholelithiasisCholecystitis
MORTALITY OF URGENCY VERSUS ELECTIVE VIDEOLAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY FOR ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS

基本信息

模态
表格
大小
0.000038912 GB
许可
CC BY 4.0
创建/更新时间
2022-06-02
版本
v1

资源简介

急性胆囊炎紧急与择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的死亡率

【一句话概览】

本数据集是 figshare 公开的结构化表格数据集,收录 4 个文件、合计 38.91 KB,主题涵盖 Laparoscopic cholecystectomy、Cholelithiasis、Cholecystitis,可用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析,CC BY 4.0 许可开放获取。

【数据集背景】

本数据集源站标题为《MORTALITY OF URGENCY VERSUS ELECTIVE VIDEOLAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY FOR ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS》。配套论文《MORTALITY OF URGENCY VERSUS ELECTIVE VIDEOLAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY FOR ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS》发表于 ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo)(2017),DOI:10.1590/0102-6720201700010013。源站首次发布:2022-06-02。

【数据内容】

源站原始描述:ABSTRACT Background: Surgical approach is still controversial in patients with acute cholecystitis: to treat clinically the inflammatory process and operate electively later or to operate immediately on an emergency basis? Aim: To test the hypothesis that urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis has a higher mortality than elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: From the data available in Datasus, mortality was compared between patients undergoing elective laparoscopic…

【数据结构与技术规格】

文件数 4 个,合计 38.91 KB。数据集 DOI:10.6084/m9.figshare.19970955.v1。

【主题与分类】

源站学科分类:Gastroenterology and Hepatology、Surgery。主题标签:Laparoscopic cholecystectomy、Cholelithiasis、Cholecystitis。

【适用方向】

结构化表格数据可直接用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析。

【获取与许可】

源站页面:https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/MORTALITY_OF_URGENCY_VERSUS_ELECTIVE_VIDEOLAPAROSCOPIC_CHOLECYSTECTOMY_FOR_ACUTE_CHOLECYSTITIS/19970955

使用许可:CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。

规范引用:FELÍCIO, Saulo José Oliveira; MATOS, Ediriomar Peixoto; CERQUEIRA, Antonio Maurício; FARIAS, Kurt Wolfgang Schindler Freire de; SILVA, Ramon de Assis; TORRES, Mateus de Oliveira (2017). MORTALITY OF URGENCY VERSUS ELECTIVE VIDEOLAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY FOR ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS. SciELO journals. D…

【使用注意】

· 源站最后修改于 2023-06-01,引用时请注意版本时效。

官方服务

专家保障全链路合规授权与标注交付

陕川双基地 × 超十家三甲医院直连

从合规授权、采集治理、专业标注到数据集交付,我们提供全链路闭环服务,让高质量临床数据即拿即用。

⚡️ 需要原始数据或标注支持?联系我们获取定制方案。

帮我联系

下载信息

注册下载

需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。

暂未开放

公开下载

无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。

免登录

有偿下载

公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。

提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)

暂未开放

当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。

使用方式

数据集获取(Figshare)

命令行下载

curl -L -o "Table_1.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/35568309"
curl -L -o "Table_2.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/35568312"
curl -L -o "Table_3.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/35568315"
curl -L -o "Table_4.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/35568318"

文件清单

  • Table_1.xls(9.73 KB)
  • Table_2.xls(9.73 KB)
  • Table_3.xls(9.73 KB)
  • Table_4.xls(9.73 KB)

文件总体积 38.91 KB(源站 API 实测)。

数据加载示例(图像类)

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

ABSTRACT Background: Surgical approach is still controversial in patients with acute cholecystitis: to treat clinically the inflammatory process and operate electively later or to operate immediately on an emergency basis? Aim: To test the hypothesis that urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis has a higher mortality than elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: From the data available in Datasus, mortality was compared between patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis and in urgency. Calculations were made of the relative reduction in risk of death, absolute reduction of risk of death and number needed to treat. Results: From 2009 to 2014 in Brazil, there were 250.439 laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 74.6% were electives. Mortality in the emergency group was 4.8 times higher compared to the elective group (0.0023% vs. 0.00048%). Despite the relative reduction in risk of death (RRR) was 83%, in the calculation of absolute risk was found 0.0018 and number needed to treat of 55,555. Conclusions: Despite the relative risk reduction for mortality was high comparing elective vs. urgent basis, the absolute risk reduction was minimal, since this outcome is very low in both groups, suggesting that mortality should not have much influence on surgical decision.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.19970955.v1(source: https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/MORTALITY_OF_URGENCY_VERSUS_ELECTIVE_VIDEOLAPAROSCOPIC_CHOLECYSTECTOMY_FOR_ACUTE_CHOLECYSTITIS/19970955)。

数据缺失?

依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。

⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。

获取专属数据定制方案