手工与信息学方法比较非PRO3连续CDAI元素的结果

资源简介

手工与信息学方法比较非PRO3连续CDAI元素的结果

【数据集背景】

本数据集源站标题为《Comparison of the results of non-PRO3, continuous CDAI elements by manual vs informatics methods.》。源站首次发布：2023-03-02。

【数据内容】

源站原始描述：Mean absolute error was calculated only for values that were non-missing by both informatics and manual methods. Comparisons were made against the annotations performed by one chart reviewer (45 patients), roughly a quarter of the 183 patients who met all eligibility criteria prior to application of the baseline CDAI requirement

【数据结构与技术规格】

文件数 1 个，合计 5.63 KB。Table 3.xls：application/vnd.ms-excel，5.63 KB。数据集 DOI：10.1371/journal.pone.0282267.t003。

【主题与分类】

源站学科分类：Medicine、Biotechnology、Immunology、Information Systems not elsewhere classified、Cancer、Infectious Diseases。主题标签：ustekinumab reference arm、manually screened records、external control arm、exceeding planned enrollment、crohn &# 8217、missing baseline data、balance missing data、algorithmic data curation、identify patients meeting、care clinical data。

【适用方向】

结构化表格数据可直接用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析。

【获取与许可】

源站页面：https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Comparison_of_the_results_of_non-PRO3_continuous_CDAI_elements_by_manual_vs_informatics_methods_/22205770

使用许可：CC BY 4.0（https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/）。

规范引用：Rudrapatna, Vivek A.; Cheng, Yao-Wen; Feuille, Colin; Mosenia, Arman; Shih, Jonathan; Shi, Yongmei; et al. (2023). Comparison of the results of non-PRO3, continuous CDAI elements by manual vs informatics methods.. PLOS ONE. Dataset

【使用注意】

· 源站最后修改于 2023-06-21，引用时请注意版本时效。