数据表1_主流大语言模型在自身免疫性肝炎患者教育中的性能评估：可读性、质量与可靠性的比较研究.docx

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Data Sheet 1_Performance evaluation of mainstream large language models in autoimmune hepatitis patient education: a comparative study of readability, quality, and reliability.docx
• DOI：10.3389/fpubh.2026.1805848.s001
• 发布日期：2026-03-20
• 文件数：1 个
• 文件总体积：14.36 KB
• 源站页面：https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_Sheet_1_Performance_evaluation_of_mainstream_large_language_models_in_autoimmune_hepatitis_patient_education_a_comparative_study_of_readability_quality_and_reliability_docx/31818586

命令行下载

curl -L -o "Data Sheet 1_Performance evaluation of mainstream large language models in autoimmune hepatitis patient education: a comparative study of readability,.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/62968519"

文件清单

• Data Sheet 1_Performance evaluation of mainstream large language models in autoimmune hepatitis patient education: a comparative study of readability,.docx（14.36 KB）

文件总体积 14.36 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据说明

BackgroundAutoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic immune-mediated liver disease that requires long-term management, in which effective patient education plays a critical role. With the rapid development of large language models (LLMs), AI-generated health information is increasingly accessed by patients; however, the readability, quality, and educational suitability of LLM-generated AIH-related content remain insufficiently evaluated.
MethodsFive widely used LLMs—ChatGPT, Doubao, DeepSeek, Wenxin Yiyan, and Tongyi Qianwen—were assessed based on their responses to 20 frequently asked AIH patient education questions covering five thematic categories. Text readability was evaluated using multiple indices, including the Automated Readability Index, Flesch Reading Ease Score, Gunning Fog Index, Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level, Coleman–Liau Index, SMOG, and Linsear Write formula. Information quality and educational suitability were assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and the Chinese version of the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (C-PEMAT). Clinical Intent Alignment (CIA) was used to evaluate the coverage of guideline-defined medical key points based on the 2025 EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines. Inter-rater reliability was analyzed using Cohen’s kappa, and comparative and correlation analyses were performed.
ResultsSignificant differences were observed among the LLMs in readability, information quality, and educational suitability (all p Substantial variability exists among LLMs in generating AIH patient education materials. Model selection critically influences information quality and educational suitability, whereas content theme primarily affects linguistic complexity. Although most models produced moderate-to-good quality information, relatively high readability levels suggest that further simplification may be needed for general patient populations. A multidimensional evaluation framework integrating readability, quality, educational suitability, and clinical intent alignment is essential for the responsible use of LLMs in AIH patient education.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1805848.s001（source: https://frontiersin.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Data_Sheet_1_Performance_evaluation_of_mainstream_large_language_models_in_autoimmune_hepatitis_patient_education_a_comparative_study_of_readability_quality_and_reliability_docx/31818586）。