间歇性气压压缩与神经肌肉电刺激的比较：超声和激光多普勒血流测量

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Comparison of intermittent pneumatic compression and neuromuscular electrical stimulation using ultrasound and laser doppler fluximetry
• DOI：10.6084/m9.figshare.930433.v1
• 发布日期：2014-02-12
• 文件数：1 个
• 文件总体积：343.02 KB
• 源站页面：https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Comparison_of_intermittent_pneumatic_compression_and_neuromuscular_electrical_stimulation_using_ultrasound_and_laser_doppler_fluximetry/930433

命令行下载

curl -L -o "IPC vs geko.pdf" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/1381371"

文件清单

• IPC vs geko.pdf（343.02 KB）

文件总体积 343.02 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

INTRODUCTION - Enhancement of peripheral circulation has demonstrated benefit in many vascular disorders. This study compares the haemodynamic efficacy of a novel neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) device with IPC in healthy subjects.

METHODS – 10 healthy volunteers were randomised into two groups. Baseline measurements of superficial femoral arterial and venous velocity and flow were taken. Subjects received bilateral therapy with both devices in turn - SCD Express (Kendall) and geko-T1 (Firstkind UK), the order reversed between groups. Laser doppler fluximetry readings were taken from hand and foot. Baseline readings were compared with readings after immediate cessation, and after 10 minutes.

RESULTS –6 males and 4 females, mean age 27.1, BMI 24.8 completed the study. IPC caused 51% (p=0.002), 5% (ns) and 3% (ns) median changes in venous peak velocity, TAMV and flow rate respectively; NMES stimulation caused a 103%, 101% and 101% median changes in the same parameters (all p=0.002). The benefit was lost upon deactivation. IPC did not improve arterial haemodynamics. NMES caused 11%, 84% and 75% increase in arterial parameters (pDISCUSSION – The NMES device enhances venous flow and peak velocity in the legs of healthy subjects, warranting further clinical evaluation. It enhances arterial TAMV and flow rate, which may prove to be of clinical use in the management of peripheral arterial disease.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.930433.v1（source: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Comparison_of_intermittent_pneumatic_compression_and_neuromuscular_electrical_stimulation_using_ultrasound_and_laser_doppler_fluximetry/930433）。