不同形式远程医疗对心力衰竭患者的比较效果：系统综述和网络Meta分析

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Comparative Effectiveness of Different Forms of Telemedicine for Individuals with Heart Failure (HF): A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
• DOI：10.1371/journal.pone.0118681
• 发布日期：2015-02-25
• 文件数：4 个
• 文件总体积：1.21 MB
• 源站页面：https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Comparative_Effectiveness_of_Different_Forms_of_Telemedicine_for_Individuals_with_Heart_Failure_HF_A_Systematic_Review_and_Network_Meta_Analysis_/1318401

命令行下载

curl -L -o "S1_PRISMA_Checklist.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/1925010"
curl -L -o "S1_Fig.tif" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/1925011"
curl -L -o "S2_Fig.tif" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/1925012"
curl -L -o "S1_File.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/1925013"

文件清单

• S1_PRISMA_Checklist.docx（21.62 KB）
• S1_Fig.tif（278.79 KB）
• S2_Fig.tif（185.72 KB）
• S1_File.docx（727.23 KB）

文件总体积 1.21 MB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Background
Previous studies on telemedicine have either focused on its role in the management of chronic diseases in general or examined its effectiveness in comparison to standard post-discharge care. Little has been done to determine the comparative impact of different telemedicine options for a specific population such as individuals with heart failure (HF).
Methods and Findings
Systematic reviews (SR) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined telephone support, telemonitoring, video monitoring or electrocardiographic monitoring for HF patients were identified using a comprehensive search of the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and The Cochrane Library. Studies were included if they reported the primary outcome of mortality or any of the following secondary outcomes: all-cause hospitalization and heart failure hospitalization. Thirty RCTs (N = 10,193 patients) were included. Compared to usual care, structured telephone support was found to reduce the odds of mortality(Odds Ratio 0.80; 95% Credible Intervals [0.66 to 0.96]) and hospitalizations due to heart failure (0.69; [0.56 to 0.85]). Telemonitoring was also found to reduce the odds of mortality(0.53; [0.36 to 0.80]) and reduce hospitalizations related to heart failure (0.64; [0.39 to 0.95]) compared to usual post-discharge care. Interventions that involved ECG monitoring also reduced the odds of hospitalization due to heart failure (0.71; [0.52 to 0.98]).
Limitations
Much of the evidence currently available has focused on the comparing either telephone support or telemonitoring with usual care. This has therefore limited our current understanding of how some of the less common forms of telemedicine compare to one another.
Conclusions
Compared to usual care, structured telephone support and telemonitoring significantly reduced the odds of deaths and hospitalization due to heart failure. Despite being the most widely studied forms of telemedicine, little has been done to directly compare these two interventions against one another. Further research into their comparative cost-effectiveness is also warranted.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0118681（source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/_Comparative_Effectiveness_of_Different_Forms_of_Telemedicine_for_Individuals_with_Heart_Failure_HF_A_Systematic_Review_and_Network_Meta_Analysis_/1318401）。