1990年清洁空气法案修正案健康影响评估数据集

基于美国Medicare人群数据和因果推断方法,评估1990年清洁空气法案修正案对心血管和痴呆住院的避免效果,数据为表格形式。

Figshare
2020-08-24 更新
浏览 17
表格1990 Clean Air Act AmendmentsBayesian additive regression treesCounterfactual pollution exposuresMatching
Evaluation of the Health Impacts of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments Using Causal Inference and Machine Learning

基本信息

模态
表格
大小
0.001481172 GB
许可
CC BY 4.0
创建/更新时间
2020-08-24
版本
v2

资源简介

1990年清洁空气法案修正案健康影响评估数据集

【数据集背景】

本数据集源站标题为《Evaluation of the Health Impacts of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments Using Causal Inference and Machine Learning》。配套论文《Evaluation of the health impacts of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments using causal inference and machine learning》发表于 Journal of the American Statistical Association(2020),DOI:10.1080/01621459.2020.1803883。项目资助方:The authors gratefully acknowledge NIH funding: 5T32ES007142-35, R01ES024332, R01ES026217, P50MD010428, DP2MD012722, R01ES028033, R01GM111339, R01HD092580, R01AG060232-01A1, and R01MD012769; HEI grant 4953-RFA14-3/16-4; and EPA grant 83587201-0.。源站首次发布:2020-09-16。

【数据内容】

源站原始描述:We develop a causal inference approach to estimate the number of adverse health events that were prevented due to changes in exposure to multiple pollutants attributable to a large-scale air quality intervention/regulation, with a focus on the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA). We introduce a causal estimand called the total events avoided (TEA) by the regulation, defined as the difference in the number of health events expected under the no-regulation pollution exposures and the number obser…

【数据结构与技术规格】

文件数 29 个,合计 1.48 MB。.DS_Store:application/octet-stream,6.15 KB。.DS_Store:application/octet-stream,6.15 KB。.DS_Store:application/octet-stream,6.15 KB。数据集 DOI:10.6084/m9.figshare.12851295.v2。

【主题与分类】

源站学科分类:Medicine、Environmental Sciences not elsewhere classified、Science Policy。主题标签:1990 Clean Air Act Amendments、Bayesian additive regression trees、Counterfactual pollution exposures、Matching。

【适用方向】

结构化表格数据可直接用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析。

【获取与许可】

源站页面:https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Evaluation_of_the_health_impacts_of_the_1990_Clean_Air_Act_Amendments_using_causal_inference_and_machine_learning/12851295

使用许可:CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。

规范引用:Evaluation of the Health Impacts of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments Using Causal Inference and Machine Learning. Taylor & Francis. Nethery, Rachel C.; Mealli, Fabrizia; Sacks, Jason D.; Dominici, Francesca

【使用注意】

· 源站最后修改于 2023-05-31,引用时请注意版本时效。

官方服务

专家保障全链路合规授权与标注交付

陕川双基地 × 超十家三甲医院直连

从合规授权、采集治理、专业标注到数据集交付,我们提供全链路闭环服务,让高质量临床数据即拿即用。

⚡️ 需要原始数据或标注支持?联系我们获取定制方案。

帮我联系

下载信息

注册下载

需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。

暂未开放

公开下载

无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。

免登录

有偿下载

公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。

提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)

暂未开放

当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。

使用方式

数据集获取(Figshare)

命令行下载

curl -L -o ".DS_Store" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/24696525"
curl -L -o ".DS_Store" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/24696528"
curl -L -o ".DS_Store" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/24696531"
curl -L -o ".DS_Store" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/24696534"
curl -L -o ".DS_Store" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/24696537"
curl -L -o ".DS_Store" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/24696540"
curl -L -o ".Rhistory" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/24696543"
curl -L -o ".Rhistory" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/24696546"

文件清单

  • .DS_Store(6.15 KB)
  • .DS_Store(6.15 KB)
  • .DS_Store(6.15 KB)
  • .DS_Store(6.15 KB)
  • .DS_Store(6.15 KB)
  • .DS_Store(6.15 KB)
  • .Rhistory(31.34 KB)
  • .Rhistory(31.34 KB)
  • .Rhistory(31.34 KB)
  • README.md(442 B)
  • README.md(442 B)
  • analysis_wholeUS.R(9.65 KB)
  • create_dataset.R(2.02 KB)
  • exmatch_trt_v2.R(516 B)
  • exmatch_trt_v2.R(516 B)
  • figure_2.R(1.52 KB)
  • figure_2_verify.pdf(6.51 KB)
  • match_rn_app_v2.R(1.01 KB)
  • match_rn_app_v2.R(1.01 KB)
  • match_rn_boot6.R(1.42 KB)

文件总体积 1.48 MB(源站 API 实测)。

数据加载示例(图像类)

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

We develop a causal inference approach to estimate the number of adverse health events that were prevented due to changes in exposure to multiple pollutants attributable to a large-scale air quality intervention/regulation, with a focus on the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA). We introduce a causal estimand called the total events avoided (TEA) by the regulation, defined as the difference in the number of health events expected under the no-regulation pollution exposures and the number observed with-regulation. We propose matching and machine learning methods that leverage population-level pollution and health data to estimate the TEA. Our approach improves upon traditional methods for regulation health impact analyses by formalizing causal identifying assumptions, using population-level data, minimizing parametric assumptions, and collectively analyzing multiple pollutants. To reduce model-dependence, our approach estimates cumulative health impacts in the subset of regions with projected no-regulation features lying within the support of the observed with-regulation data, thereby providing a conservative but data-driven assessment to complement traditional parametric approaches. We analyze the health impacts of the CAAA in the U.S. Medicare population in the year 2000, and our estimates suggest that large numbers of cardiovascular and dementia-related hospitalizations were avoided due to CAAA-attributable changes in pollution exposure. Supplementary materials for this article, including a standardized description of the materials available for reproducing the work, are available as an online supplement.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.12851295.v2(source: https://tandf.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Evaluation_of_the_health_impacts_of_the_1990_Clean_Air_Act_Amendments_using_causal_inference_and_machine_learning/12851295)。

数据缺失?

依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。

⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。

获取专属数据定制方案