公共与私人心脏康复项目中高低依从性患者的障碍分析

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Analysis of Barriers to Public and Private Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs in Patients with Low and High Adherence
• DOI：10.6084/m9.figshare.22548342.v1
• 发布日期：2023-04-04
• 文件数：3 个
• 文件总体积：265.10 KB
• 源站页面：https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Analysis_of_Barriers_to_Public_and_Private_Cardiac_Rehabilitation_Programs_in_Patients_with_Low_and_High_Adherence/22548342

命令行下载

curl -L -o "21ea9f6823d032d0f36764e685b42eff7cfcb19b.tif" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/40013781"
curl -L -o "8cf7ab55753c1ea0946559117aca4261f4b5b3f5.png" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/40013784"
curl -L -o "30037330c6d6e444b50ba0e9a79af56fa1d14cf3.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/40013787"

文件清单

• 21ea9f6823d032d0f36764e685b42eff7cfcb19b.tif（171.18 KB）
• 8cf7ab55753c1ea0946559117aca4261f4b5b3f5.png（89.29 KB）
• 30037330c6d6e444b50ba0e9a79af56fa1d14cf3.jpg（4.63 KB）

文件总体积 265.10 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

ABSTRACT Introduction: Participants in cardiac rehabilitation programs have low adherence to their sessions, which makes extremely important to recognize the barriers that cause non-adherence, identifying whether the type of service and level of adherence influence these barriers. Methods: This is a cross-sectional observational study, in which 220 individuals (66.80±11.59 years) of both genders who are members of public and private exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programs participated. The volunteers were divided according to the level of adherence, considering patients with low adherence (PLA) those with 70%. Then, initial evaluation, Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale, analysis of socioeconomic level, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Mini-Mental State Examination were applied. Results: Higher total barriers were found in PLA in the public service compared to PHA in the private service (P=0.023). In the subscale “perceived need”, PHA in the public service showed higher values than PLA and PHA in the private service (P≤0.001). The “access” barrier was higher for PHA in the public service when compared to PHA in the private service (P=0.024). PHA in the public service exhibited a higher barrier regarding questions about distance, transportation problems, cost, and time constraints. Conclusion: The public program presents higher barriers in the questions and categories compared to the private program, mainly the PHA. Furthermore, there are differences in the profile of the participants regarding socioeconomic and anxiety levels, treatment time, ethnicity, and city where they live.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.22548342.v1（source: https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Analysis_of_Barriers_to_Public_and_Private_Cardiac_Rehabilitation_Programs_in_Patients_with_Low_and_High_Adherence/22548342）。