PICOS 系统评价数据
包含心房颤动诊断数字技术系统评价的PICOS表格数据,用于支持系统评价的透明性和可重复性。

基本信息
资源简介
PICOS 系统评价数据
【数据集背景】
本数据集源站标题为《PICOS of the systematic review.》。配套论文《Diagnostic accuracy of digital technologies compared with 12-lead ECG in the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation in adults: A protocol for a systematic review》发表于 PLOS ONE(2024),DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0301729。源站首次发布:2024-05-08。
【数据内容】
源站原始描述:Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia in the world. AF increases the risk of stroke 5-fold, though the risk can be reduced with appropriate treatment. Therefore, early diagnosis is imperative but remains a global challenge. In low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), a lack of diagnostic equipment and under-resourced healthcare systems generate further barriers. The rapid development of digital technologies that are capable of diagnosing AF remotely and cos…
【数据结构与技术规格】
文件数 1 个,合计 5.63 KB。Table 1.xls:application/vnd.ms-excel,5.63 KB。数据集 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0301729.t001。
【主题与分类】
源站学科分类:Medicine、Information Systems not elsewhere classified、Developmental Biology、Cancer、Infectious Diseases、Virology。主题标签:random effect model、prevalent cardiac arrhythmia、negative predictive value、free text terms、assessing heterogeneity across、independently assess articles、digital technologies exist、digital technologies compared、corresponding index terms、extract data using。
【适用方向】
结构化表格数据可直接用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析。
【获取与许可】
源站页面:https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/PICOS_of_the_systematic_review_/25775974
使用许可:CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。
规范引用:Sheron, Vethanayagam Antony; Surenthirakumaran, Rajendra; Gooden, Tiffany E.; Lip, Gregory Y. H.; Thomas, G. Neil; Moore, David J.; et al. (2024). PICOS of the systematic review.. PLOS ONE. Dataset
下载信息
注册下载
需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。
暂未开放公开下载
无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。
免登录有偿下载
公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。
提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)
暂未开放当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。
使用方式
数据集获取(Figshare)
- 源站标题:PICOS of the systematic review.
- DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0301729.t001
- 发布日期:2024-05-08
- 文件数:1 个
- 文件总体积:5.63 KB
- 源站页面:https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/PICOS_of_the_systematic_review_/25775974
命令行下载
curl -L -o "Table 1.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/46184158"
文件清单
Table 1.xls(5.63 KB)
文件总体积 5.63 KB(源站 API 实测)。
数据说明
Background
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia in the world. AF increases the risk of stroke 5-fold, though the risk can be reduced with appropriate treatment. Therefore, early diagnosis is imperative but remains a global challenge. In low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), a lack of diagnostic equipment and under-resourced healthcare systems generate further barriers. The rapid development of digital technologies that are capable of diagnosing AF remotely and cost-effectively could prove beneficial for LMICs. However, evidence is lacking on what digital technologies exist and how they compare in regards to diagnostic accuracy. We aim to systematically review the diagnostic accuracy of all digital technologies capable of AF diagnosis.
Methods
MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science will be searched for eligible studies. Free text terms will be combined with corresponding index terms where available and searches will not be limited by language nor time of publication. Cohort or cross-sectional studies comprising adult (≥18 years) participants will be included. Only studies that use a 12-lead ECG as the reference test (comparator) and report outcomes of sensitivity, specificity, the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) or the positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) will be included (or if they provide sufficient data to calculate these outcomes). Two reviewers will independently assess articles for inclusion, extract data using a piloted tool and assess risk of bias using the QUADAS-2 tool. The feasibility of a meta-analysis will be determined by assessing heterogeneity across the studies, grouped by index device, diagnostic threshold and setting. If a meta-analysis is feasible for any index device, pooled sensitivity and specificity will be calculated using a random effect model and presented in forest plots.
Discussion
The findings of our review will provide a comprehensive synthesis of the diagnostic accuracy of available digital technologies capable for diagnosing AF. Thus, this review will aid in the identification of which devices could be further trialed and implemented, particularly in a LMIC setting, to improve the early dia
许可
CC BY 4.0
引用
学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0301729.t001(source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/PICOS_of_the_systematic_review_/25775974)。
数据缺失?
依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。
⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。




