方法学评分数据集

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Methodologic scores.
• DOI：10.1371/journal.pone.0281090.t005
• 发布日期：2023-02-24
• 文件数：1 个
• 文件总体积：9.73 KB
• 源站页面：https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Methodologic_scores_/22158135

命令行下载

curl -L -o "Table 5.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/39394419"

文件清单

• Table 5.xls（9.73 KB）

文件总体积 9.73 KB（源站 API 实测）。

数据说明

Background
The purpose of our study is to assess the methodology of overlapping systematic reviews related to cemented vs uncemented hip hemiarthroplasties for the treatment of femoral neck fractures to find the study with the best evidence. Also, we assess the gaps in methodology and information to help with direction of future studies.
Methods
A systematic search was conducted in September 2022 using Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Clinical outcome data and characteristics of each study were extracted to see which treatment had better favorability. The outcomes and characteristics extracted from each study includes, first author, search date, publication journal and date, number of studies included, databases, level of evidence, software used, subgroup analyses that were conducted, and heterogeneity with the use of I2 statistics Methodological quality information was extracted from each study using four different methodologic scores (Oxford Levels of Evidence; Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR); Quality of reporting of meta-analyses (QUROM); Oxman and Guyatt. After that, the Jadad decision algorithm was used to identify which studies in our sample contained the best available evidence. Finally, overlap of each systematic review was assessed using Corrected Covered Area (CCA) to look at redundancy and research waste among the systematic reviews published on the topic.
Results
After screening, 12 studies were included in our sample. For the Oxford Levels of Evidence, we found that all the studies were Level I evidence. For the QUORUM assessment, we had 1 study with the highest score of 18. Additionally, we did the Oxman and Guyatt assessment, where we found 4 studies with a maximum score of 6. Finally, we did an AMSTAR assessment and found 2 studies with a score of 9. After conducting the methodological scores; the authors determined that Li. L et al 2021 had the highest quality. In addition, it was found that the CCA found among the primary studies in each systematic review calculated to .22. Any CCA above .15 is considered “very high overlap”.
Conclusions
The best available evidence suggests that Cemented HAs are better at preventing Pros

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0281090.t005（source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Methodologic_scores_/22158135）。