跟骨骨折中LCP与髓内钉内固定的比较
比较LCP钢板与C-Nail髓内钉治疗Sanders II/III型跟骨骨折的临床数据集。
基本信息
资源简介
跟骨骨折中LCP与髓内钉内固定的比较
【一句话概览】
本数据集是 figshare 公开的结构化表格数据集，收录 16 个文件、合计 2.06 MB，主题涵盖 Minimally Invasive Surgery、Heel Bone、Bone Nail、Bone Plate，可用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析，CC BY-NC 4.0 许可开放获取。
【数据集背景】
本数据集源站标题为《COMPARISON OF LCP AND INTRAMEDULLARY NAIL OSTEOSYNTHESIS IN CALCANEAL FRACTURES》。配套论文《COMPARISON OF LCP AND INTRAMEDULLARY NAIL OSTEOSYNTHESIS IN CALCANEAL FRACTURES》发表于 Acta Ortopédica Brasileira（2019），DOI：10.1590/1413-785220192706223193。源站首次发布：2019-11-06。
【数据内容】
源站原始描述：ABSTRACT Objective: This study compared groups of patients with calcaneal fractures of Sanders types II and III. One group was treated with ORIF using an LCP (plate), while the second was treated with a minimally invasive method using a C-Nail. Methods: The study included 217 patients in the ORIF group and 19 patients in the minimally invasive nail osteosynthesis group. Results: In the LCP group, the outcomes were excellent for 35.7% of the patients; good, 38.9%; satisfactory, 19.7%; and poor, 5…
【数据结构与技术规格】
文件数 16 个，合计 2.06 MB。数据集 DOI：10.6084/m9.figshare.10258307.v1。
【主题与分类】
源站学科分类：Orthopaedics。主题标签：Minimally Invasive Surgery、Heel Bone、Bone Nail、Bone Plate。
【适用方向】
结构化表格数据可直接用于统计建模、特征工程与队列分析。
【获取与许可】
源站页面：https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/COMPARISON_OF_LCP_AND_INTRAMEDULLARY_NAIL_OSTEOSYNTHESIS_IN_CALCANEAL_FRACTURES/10258307
使用许可：CC BY-NC 4.0（https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/）。
规范引用：Zeman, Jaroslav; Zeman, Petr; Matejka, Tomas; Belatka, Jaroslav; Matejka, Jiri (2019). COMPARISON OF LCP AND INTRAMEDULLARY NAIL OSTEOSYNTHESIS IN CALCANEAL FRACTURES. SciELO journals. Dataset
【使用注意】
· 源站最后修改于 2023-05-30，引用时请注意版本时效。
下载信息
注册下载
需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载，适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。
暂未开放公开下载
无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档，适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。
免登录有偿下载
公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。
提供高速下载与技术交付服务（收技术服务费，非数据销售）
暂未开放当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管，完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。
使用方式
数据集获取（Figshare）
- 源站标题：COMPARISON OF LCP AND INTRAMEDULLARY NAIL OSTEOSYNTHESIS IN CALCANEAL FRACTURES
- DOI：10.6084/m9.figshare.10258307.v1
- 发布日期：2019-11-06
- 文件数：16 个
- 文件总体积：2.06 MB
- 源站页面：https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/COMPARISON_OF_LCP_AND_INTRAMEDULLARY_NAIL_OSTEOSYNTHESIS_IN_CALCANEAL_FRACTURES/10258307
命令行下载
curl -L -o "1809-4406-aob-27-06-0288-gf01.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/18523586"
curl -L -o "1809-4406-aob-27-06-0288-gf02.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/18523592"
curl -L -o "1809-4406-aob-27-06-0288-gf03.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/18523598"
curl -L -o "1809-4406-aob-27-06-0288-gf04.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/18523601"
curl -L -o "1809-4406-aob-27-06-0288-gf05.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/18523604"
curl -L -o "1809-4406-aob-27-06-0288-gf06.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/18523607"
curl -L -o "1809-4406-aob-27-06-0288-gf07.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/18523610"
curl -L -o "1809-4406-aob-27-06-0288-gf08.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/18523613"
文件清单
1809-4406-aob-27-06-0288-gf01.jpg（293.97 KB）1809-4406-aob-27-06-0288-gf02.jpg（269.70 KB）1809-4406-aob-27-06-0288-gf03.jpg（254.82 KB）1809-4406-aob-27-06-0288-gf04.jpg（223.68 KB）1809-4406-aob-27-06-0288-gf05.jpg（166.75 KB）1809-4406-aob-27-06-0288-gf06.jpg（172.42 KB）1809-4406-aob-27-06-0288-gf07.jpg（138.10 KB）1809-4406-aob-27-06-0288-gf08.jpg（128.79 KB）1809-4406-aob-27-06-0288-gf09.jpg（122.30 KB）1809-4406-aob-27-06-0288-gf10.jpg（124.30 KB）1809-4406-aob-27-06-0288-gf11.jpg（139.46 KB）Table_1.xls（5.63 KB）Table_2.xls（5.63 KB）Table_3.xls（5.63 KB）Table_4.xls（5.63 KB）Table_5.xls（5.63 KB）
文件总体积 2.06 MB（源站 API 实测）。
数据加载示例（图像类）
from PIL import Image
import glob, os
files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
+ glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
+ glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)
# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path) # 要求 子目录=类别
目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。
数据说明
ABSTRACT Objective: This study compared groups of patients with calcaneal fractures of Sanders types II and III. One group was treated with ORIF using an LCP (plate), while the second was treated with a minimally invasive method using a C-Nail. Methods: The study included 217 patients in the ORIF group and 19 patients in the minimally invasive nail osteosynthesis group. Results: In the LCP group, the outcomes were excellent for 35.7% of the patients; good, 38.9%; satisfactory, 19.7%; and poor, 5.7%. In the C-Nail group, the outcomes were excellent for 36.9% of the patients; good; 31.6%; satisfactory, 21%; and poor, 10.2%. The mean values of the restoration of Böhler’‘s angle from post-injury were 6.8° to 32.3° in the LCP group and 7.1° to 33.3° in the C-Nail group. After 12 months, there was only a minimal decrease in Böhler’'s angle to 29.2° in both the LCP and C-Nail groups. Conclusion: The outcomes obtained with C-Nail fixation are statistically identical to those obtained with LCP fixation. We conclude that osteosynthesis with a C-Nail is suitable as the first-choice treatment for Sanders types II and III fractures. Level of evidence IV, retrospective observational study.
许可
CC BY-NC 4.0
引用
学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.10258307.v1（source: https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/COMPARISON_OF_LCP_AND_INTRAMEDULLARY_NAIL_OSTEOSYNTHESIS_IN_CALCANEAL_FRACTURES/10258307）。
数据缺失？
依托陕西、四川两大基地，我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系，覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程，为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。
⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务？立即联系我们获取专业方案。
