比较可调节经闭孔男性系统（ATOMS）与可调节控尿疗法（ProACT）治疗男性压力性尿失禁的系统综述和Meta分析

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing Adjustable Transobturator Male System (ATOMS) and Adjustable Continence Therapy (ProACT) for male stress incontinence
• DOI：10.1371/journal.pone.0225762
• 发布日期：2019-12-02
• 文件数：4 个
• 文件总体积：23.28 MB
• 源站页面：https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Systematic_review_and_meta-analysis_comparing_Adjustable_Transobturator_Male_System_ATOMS_and_Adjustable_Continence_Therapy_ProACT_for_male_stress_incontinence/11304137

命令行下载

curl -L -o "pone.0225762.s001.doc" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/20035424"
curl -L -o "pone.0225762.s002.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/20035427"
curl -L -o "pone.0225762.s003.docx" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/20035430"
curl -L -o "pone.0225762.s004.tif" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/20035433"

文件清单

• pone.0225762.s001.doc（68.10 KB）
• pone.0225762.s002.docx（20.34 KB）
• pone.0225762.s003.docx（17.25 KB）
• pone.0225762.s004.tif（23.18 MB）

文件总体积 23.28 MB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Background and purpose
Urinary incontinence is one of the most serious complications of prostate cancer treatment. The objective of this study was to assess efficacy and safety of Adjustable Transobturator Male System (ATOMS) compared to Adjustable Continence Therapy (proACT) for male stress urinary incotinence according to literature findings.
Material and methods
A systematic review and meta-analysis on adjustable devices ATOMS and ProACT is presented. Studies on female or neurogenic incontinence were excluded. Differences between ATOMS and proACT in primary objective: dryness status (no-pad or one safety pad/day) after initial device adjustment, and in secondary objectives: improvement, satisfaction, complications and device durability, were estimated using random-effect model. Statistical heterogeneity among studies included in the meta-analysis was assessed using tau2, Higgins´s I2 statistics and Cochran´s Q test.
Results
Combined data of 41 observational studies with 3059 patients showed higher dryness (68 vs. 55%; p = .01) and improvement (91 vs. 80%; p = .007) rate for ATOMS than ProACT. Mean pad-count (-4 vs. -2.5 pads/day; p = .005) and pad-test decrease (-425.7 vs. -211.4 cc; p Conclusions
Despite the limitations that studies available are exclusively descriptive and the follow-up is limited, literature findings confirm ATOMS is more efficacious, with higher patient satisfaction and better durability than ProACT to treat male stress incontinence.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0225762（source: https://plos.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Systematic_review_and_meta-analysis_comparing_Adjustable_Transobturator_Male_System_ATOMS_and_Adjustable_Continence_Therapy_ProACT_for_male_stress_incontinence/11304137）。