腹膜透析和血液透析吸收成本评估：服务提供者视角与公共和私人医疗系统资金转移的比较

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Three years evaluation of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis absorption costing: perspective of the service provider compared to funds transfers from the public and private healthcare systems
• DOI：10.6084/m9.figshare.19964379.v1
• 发布日期：2022-06-02
• 文件数：6 个
• 文件总体积：26.34 MB
• 源站页面：https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Three_years_evaluation_of_peritoneal_dialysis_and_hemodialysis_absorption_costing_perspective_of_the_service_provider_compared_to_funds_transfers_from_the_public_and_private_healthcare_systems/19964379

命令行下载

curl -L -o "d65a8171406c8f502ec9eeed770c3cf7e424639f.tif" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/35537793"
curl -L -o "92fb1b926decc3f1944853bc792efb2b59bccf2e.png" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/35537796"
curl -L -o "4c23306775a2ff6791c5e71ff55e1e8a45ec94d7.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/35537799"
curl -L -o "e17b6589b9caa218af21521e46e1f3ff8dfef296.tif" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/35537802"
curl -L -o "8db3efc68a9fa76b1c3a2fb471e2158aedcf0341.png" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/35537805"
curl -L -o "c50cea83ca5164b7acbbed45c300067f8f7082c4.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/35537808"

文件清单

• d65a8171406c8f502ec9eeed770c3cf7e424639f.tif（11.97 MB）
• 92fb1b926decc3f1944853bc792efb2b59bccf2e.png（1.29 MB）
• 4c23306775a2ff6791c5e71ff55e1e8a45ec94d7.jpg（7.12 KB）
• e17b6589b9caa218af21521e46e1f3ff8dfef296.tif（11.45 MB）
• 8db3efc68a9fa76b1c3a2fb471e2158aedcf0341.png（1.62 MB）
• c50cea83ca5164b7acbbed45c300067f8f7082c4.jpg（8.55 KB）

文件总体积 26.34 MB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Abstract Introduction: 72% of renal replacement therapy (RRT) clinics in Brazil are private. However, regarding payment for dialysis therapy, 80% of the patients are covered by the Unified Health System (SUS) and 20% by private healthcare (PH). Objectives: To evaluate costs for peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) from the perspective of the service provider and compare with fund transfers from SUS and private healthcare. Methods: The absorption costing method was applied in a private clinic. Study horizon: January 2013 - December 2016. Analyzed variables: personnel, medical supplies, tax expenses, permanent assets, and labor benefits. The input-output matrix method was used for analysis. Results: A total of 27,666 HD sessions were performed in 2013, 26,601 in 2014, 27,829 in 2015, and 28,525 in 2016. There were 264 patients on PD in 2013, 348 in 2014, 372 in 2015, and 300 in 2016. The mean monthly cost of the service provider was R$ 981.10 for a HD session for patients with hepatitis B; R$ 238.30 for hepatitis C; R$197.99 for seronegative patients; and R$ 3,260.93 for PD. Comparing to fund transfers from SUS, absorption costing yielded a difference of -269.7% for hepatitis B, +10.2% for hepatitis C, -2.0% for seronegative patients, and -29.8% for PD. For PH fund transfers, absorption costing for hepatitis B yielded a difference of -50.2%, +64.24% for hepatitis C, +56.27% for seronegative patients, and +48.26 for PD. Conclusion: The comparison of costs of dialysis therapy from the perspective of the service provider with fund transfers from SUS indicated that there are cost constraints in HD and PD.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.19964379.v1（source: https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Three_years_evaluation_of_peritoneal_dialysis_and_hemodialysis_absorption_costing_perspective_of_the_service_provider_compared_to_funds_transfers_from_the_public_and_private_healthcare_systems/19964379）。