Spies™模态图像质量评估

包含不同Spies模态内窥镜视频及图像质量评分的数据集,用于评估比较各模态图像质量。

SciELO journalsSciELO journals
DataCite Commons
2022-06-08 更新
浏览 12
医学影像UreteroscopyDiagnosisLithotripsyTechnology
Evaluation of the Spies™ modalities image quality

基本信息

模态
医学影像
大小
0.00012293 GB
许可
CC BY 4.0
创建/更新时间
2022-06-08
版本
v1

资源简介

Spies™模态图像质量评估

【一句话概览】

本数据集是 figshare 公开的影像数据集,收录 3 个文件、合计 122.93 KB,主题涵盖 Ureteroscopy、Diagnosis、Lithotripsy、Technology,可用于医学图像分割、检测与分类模型的训练与评测,CC BY 4.0 许可开放获取。

【数据集背景】

本数据集源站标题为《Evaluation of the Spies™ modalities image quality》。配套论文《Evaluation of the Spies™ modalities image quality》发表于 International braz j urol(2017),DOI:10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2016.0324。源站首次发布:2022-06-08。

【数据内容】

源站原始描述:Introduction The Spies™ system (Karl-Storz®) was introduced into digital ureteroscopy to improve endoscopic vision. To date, there is no data to either indicate which of the Spies modalities is better for improving diagnosis and treatment procedures, nor to compare the modalities in terms of image quality. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the image quality of five Spies™ modalities (SM) to the standard white light in an in-vitro model. Materials and Methods Two standardized grid…

中文译文(机器翻译,仅供快速理解,请以原文为准):引言 Spies™系统(Karl-Storz®)被引入数字输尿管镜检查,以改善内镜视野。迄今为止,尚无数据表明哪种Spies模式更有利于改善诊断和治疗操作,也没有从图像质量方面对这些模式进行比较。本研究

【数据结构与技术规格】

文件数 3 个,合计 122.93 KB。数据集 DOI:10.6084/m9.figshare.20026195.v1。

【主题与分类】

源站学科分类:Nephrology and Urology。主题标签:Ureteroscopy、Diagnosis、Lithotripsy、Technology。

【适用方向】

影像类数据可用于医学图像分析模型(检测、分割、分类)的训练与评测,也可用于标注质量与成像参数相关性的研究。

【获取与许可】

源站页面:https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Evaluation_of_the_Spies_modalities_image_quality/20026195

使用许可:CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。

规范引用:Emiliani, Esteban; Talso, Michele; Baghdadi, Mohammed; Barreiro, Aarón; Orosa, Andrea; Serviàn, Pol; et al. (2017). Evaluation of the Spies™ modalities image quality. SciELO journals. Dataset

【使用注意】

· 源站最后修改于 2023-05-31,引用时请注意版本时效。

官方服务

专家保障全链路合规授权与标注交付

陕川双基地 × 超十家三甲医院直连

从合规授权、采集治理、专业标注到数据集交付,我们提供全链路闭环服务,让高质量临床数据即拿即用。

⚡️ 需要原始数据或标注支持?联系我们获取定制方案。

帮我联系

下载信息

注册下载

需要注册 Kaggle 账号并登录后下载,适合需要跟踪下载记录和使用 API 的用户。

暂未开放

公开下载

无需注册即可直接获取公开样本或文档,适合快速预览和评估数据集质量。

免登录

有偿下载

公开数据集受托下载与技术交付服务。

提供高速下载与技术交付服务(收技术服务费,非数据销售)

暂未开放

当前数据集主要来源为 Kaggle 公开托管,完整影像包建议通过原始链接或 Kaggle API 获取。

使用方式

数据集获取(Figshare)

命令行下载

curl -L -o "62d97b3c045c30eedf68869fe7ebc4e50eadb794.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/35758057"
curl -L -o "Table_1.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/35758060"
curl -L -o "Table_2.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/35758063"

文件清单

  • 62d97b3c045c30eedf68869fe7ebc4e50eadb794.jpg(111.67 KB)
  • Table_1.xls(5.63 KB)
  • Table_2.xls(5.63 KB)

文件总体积 122.93 KB(源站 API 实测)。

数据加载示例(图像类)

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

Introduction The Spies™ system (Karl-Storz®) was introduced into digital ureteroscopy to improve endoscopic vision. To date, there is no data to either indicate which of the Spies modalities is better for improving diagnosis and treatment procedures, nor to compare the modalities in terms of image quality. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the image quality of five Spies™ modalities (SM) to the standard white light in an in-vitro model. Materials and Methods Two standardized grids and 3 stones of different composition were recorded in white light and the 5SM (Clara, Chroma, Clara+Chroma), Spectra A and B) using 4 standardized aqueous scenarios. Twelve templates were done in order to simultaneously compare the same objective in the different modalities. Six urologists, five medical students, five urology residents, and five persons not involved with urology evaluated each video on a scale of 1 (very bad) to 5 (very good). Results Comparing white light to SM, subjects scored better the quality of Clara and Clara+Chroma than white light (p=0.0139 and p<0.05) and scored worse Spectra A and B (p=0.0005 and p=0.0023)). When comparing Clara to the other SM, it was ranked equivalent to Clara+Chroma (p=0.67) and obtained a higher rank than Chroma, Spectra A and B (p<0.05, p=0.0001 and p=0.0001). In the multivariate analysis mean scores were higher among urologists. Conclusion In all analyzed scenarios, the subjects ranked Clara and Clara+Chroma as the modalities with better image quality compared to white light.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.20026195.v1(source: https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Evaluation_of_the_Spies_modalities_image_quality/20026195)。

数据缺失?

依托陕西、四川两大基地,我们与超过十家三甲医院建立直接合作关系,覆盖合规授权、采集治理、专业标注、数据交付的全流程,为AI医疗团队提供即拿即用的高质量临床数据。

⚡️ 需要数据支持或标注服务?立即联系我们获取专业方案。

获取专属数据定制方案