俯卧位与三种不同仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术的比较研究

数据集获取（Figshare）

• 源站标题：Comparative study of percutaneous nephrolithotomy performed in the traditional prone position and in three different supine positions
• DOI：10.6084/m9.figshare.7898591.v1
• 发布日期：2019-03-27
• 文件数：8 个
• 文件总体积：1.04 MB
• 源站页面：https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Comparative_study_of_percutaneous_nephrolithotomy_performed_in_the_traditional_prone_position_and_in_three_different_supine_positions/7898591

命令行下载

curl -L -o "1677-6119-ibju-45-01-0108-gf01.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/14709170"
curl -L -o "1677-6119-ibju-45-01-0108-gf02.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/14709176"
curl -L -o "1677-6119-ibju-45-01-0108-gf03.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/14709182"
curl -L -o "1677-6119-ibju-45-01-0108-gf04.jpg" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/14709194"
curl -L -o "Table_1.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/14709206"
curl -L -o "Table_2.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/14709218"
curl -L -o "Table_3.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/14709224"
curl -L -o "Table_4.xls" "https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/14709233"

文件清单

• 1677-6119-ibju-45-01-0108-gf01.jpg（215.64 KB）
• 1677-6119-ibju-45-01-0108-gf02.jpg（201.95 KB）
• 1677-6119-ibju-45-01-0108-gf03.jpg（295.94 KB）
• 1677-6119-ibju-45-01-0108-gf04.jpg（296.44 KB）
• Table_1.xls（9.73 KB）
• Table_2.xls（9.73 KB）
• Table_3.xls（5.63 KB）
• Table_4.xls（5.63 KB）

文件总体积 1.04 MB（源站 API 实测）。

数据加载示例（图像类）

from PIL import Image
import glob, os

files = (glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.png"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.jpg"), recursive=True)
       + glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "**", "*.tif"), recursive=True))
print("图像文件数:", len(files))
img = Image.open(files[0]); print("尺寸/模式:", img.size, img.mode)

# torchvision Dataset 方式:
# from torchvision import datasets
# ds = datasets.ImageFolder(path)  # 要求 子目录=类别

目录组织与标注格式以源站说明和下载后实际文件为准。

数据说明

ABSTRACT Purpose: To compare the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) performed in the prone position (PRON) and in three variations of the supine position. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients that underwent PCNL at our institution from June 2011 to October 2016 in PRON and in three variations of the supine position: complete supine (COMPSUP), original Valdivia (VALD), and Galdakao - modified Valdivia (GALD). All patients had a complete pre - operative evaluation, including computed tomography (CT). Success was defined as the absence of residual fragments larger than 4 mm on the first post - operative day CT. Results: We analyzed 393 PCNLs: 100 in COMPSUP, 94 in VALD, 100 in GALD, and 99 in PRON. The overall success rate was 50.9% and was similar among groups (p = 0.428). There were no differences between groups in the number of punctures, stone - free rate, frequency of blood transfusions, drop in hemoglobin level, length of hospital stay, and severe complications (Clavien ≥ 3). COMPSUP had a significantly lower operative time than the other positions. COMPSUP had lower fluoroscopy time than VALD. Conclusion: Patient positioning in PCNL does not seem to impact the rates of success or severe complications. However, COMPSUP is associated with a shorter surgical time than the other positions.

许可

CC BY 4.0

引用

学术使用请引用 DOI 10.6084/m9.figshare.7898591.v1（source: https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Comparative_study_of_percutaneous_nephrolithotomy_performed_in_the_traditional_prone_position_and_in_three_different_supine_positions/7898591）。